Solving Vector Proof: Perpendicular Distance Between Two Parallel Planes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Giuseppe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the perpendicular distance between two parallel planes using a specific formula. The formula for the distance D between a point and a plane is provided, and it is shown that the distance between two parallel planes can be expressed as D = |d1 - d2| / √(a² + b² + c²). A key point of confusion arises regarding the algebraic manipulation of the expression |-d1 + d2| into |d1 - d2|. The clarification provided emphasizes that the absolute value property states that |-A| = |A|, which resolves the question. Understanding this property is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Giuseppe
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
hey guys, i am stuck on one more problem. Can anyone guide me onto the right path on how to start this?

Use this formula for the perpendicular distance between a point and a plane
D= |ax+by+cz-d| all over the square root of (a^2+b^2+c^2)

to show that the perpendicular distance D between the two parallel planes ax+by+cz+d1=0 and ax+by+cz+d2=0 is

D= |d1-d2| all over the square root of (a^2+b^2+c^2)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For a plane {(x, y, z) : ax + by + cz + d = 0} and a point (x', y', z'), you have that the distance from the point to the plane is:

D = \frac{|ax' + by' + cz' + d|}{\sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2}}

The distance from one plane to another parallel plane is obviously the same as the distance from that plane to any single point on the other plane. Suppose (x1, y1, z1) is on plane 1. That means that this point satisfies the equation:

ax1 + by1 + cz1 + d1 = 0

If we isolate d1, we get:

d1 = -(ax1 + by1 + cz1)

-d1 = ax1 + by1 + cz1

Now the distance between plane 2 and plane 1 is the same as the distance between plane 2 and (x1, y1, z1) since (x1, y1, z1) is on plane 1. Using the given formula:

D = \frac{|ax_1 + by_1 + cz_1 + d_2|}{\sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2}}

D = \frac{|-d_1 + d_2|}{\sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2}}

D = \frac{|d_1 - d_2|}{\sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2}}
 
i get that, but i don't get your last algebraic step. how did the -d1+d2 turn into d1-d2
 
Giuseppe said:
i get that, but i don't get your last algebraic step. how did the -d1+d2 turn into d1-d2

The question should really be
"how did |-d1+d2| turn into |d1-d2|?"
The answer is, of course, "because |-A|=|A|".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top