Answer Age of Rock: 1.7*10^9 Years

  • Thread starter Thread starter triac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Rock Years
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the age of a rock containing the radioactive isotope Rb-87, with given quantities of Rb-87 atoms and decay products. The initial calculation suggests an age of approximately 22.9 billion years based on the decay formula, but the expected answer is 1.7 billion years. Participants express confusion over the discrepancy, questioning the provided data and the interpretation of the half-life. There is a suggestion that the problem may not have been fully stated or understood, particularly regarding the correct application of the half-life. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in problem statements and accurate data for solving radioactive decay problems.
triac
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi!
I'm stuck on this one too.
"A rock contains the radioactive isotope Rb-87. A piece of this rock contained 2,05*10^20 Rb-87 atoms and 8,25*10^20 decay products per kg. The half-life of Rb-87 is 47*10^9 years. How old is the rock?"

Homework Equations


N(t)=N_0(\frac{1}{2})^{t/T_{1/2}}


The Attempt at a Solution


No nuclei (or atoms) disappear, they only decay. Therefore, the initial number of Rb-87 atoms must have been 2,05*10^20+8,25*10^20 per kg. Let's assume that we have a sample of 1 kg (the mass will change with decay, but not the number of atoms, so it doesn't matter).
Now, let x be its age. Then we can write
2,05*10^20=(2,05*10^20+8,25*10^20)(1/2)^(t/T_{1/2}) which gives us that x is approximately 22,9*10^9 years. However, in the key it says 1,7*10^9 years. What's wrong here?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your question is fully written?
Please don't use comma or dot in numbers..? it is confusing..(Germany it is common, using comma for dot)
in your case 't' should be age..but why you introduced 'x'..
is this problem is solved?
<br /> 47\times10^9 {\rm or} 4.7\times10^9<br />?
 
Last edited:
I don't think you have all the data written down correctly, if 1.7*10^9 is the answer. If you start with 10.3 atoms after one half life there would be 5.15 atoms left and 47*10^9 years would have past but you have fewer atoms left and an answer of less time which is clearly wrong. Unless i haven't understood the question
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top