Answering Relativity Questions: Earth, Spacecraft, Lorentz Transforms

  • Thread starter Thread starter uranium_235
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
uranium_235
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
A friend gave me these questions to answer.

"A certain star is 7.0 light years away. How long would it take a spacecraft traveling at .950c to reach that star from Earth, as measured by observers (a ) on Earth (b )on the aircraft (c ) what is the distance travled according tio observers on the spacecraft ? (d ) what will the spacecraft occupants compute their speed to be from the results of (b ) and (c )?"

I fear taking the obviouse path, for it may take me to answer which contradicts that which you would get if you applied the lorentz transformations, which I know nothing of. What would be the correct way of going about this question?

and this was the second question.

"Derive the general relativist equation of T = To sr (1 - v^2/c^2)"

I have no idea of how to go solving about this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
uranium_235 said:
(a ) on earth.
v = \frac{d}{t}

t = \frac{d}{v}

t = \frac{7.0cy}{0.950c}

t = 7.4y

uranium_235 said:
(b )on the aircraft.
t = t_o \sqrt{1-v^2 / c^2}

t = (7.4y) \sqrt{1-(0.950c)^2 / c^2}

t = (7.4y) \sqrt{1-(0.9025c^2 / c^2}

t = (7.4y) \sqrt{1-(0.9025)}

t = (7.4y) \sqrt{0.0975}

t = (7.4y)(0.3122)

t = 2.3y

uranium_235 said:
(c ) what is the distance travled according tio observers on the spacecraft ?

d = d_o \sqrt{1-v^2 / c^2}

d = (7.0ly) \sqrt{1-(0.950c)^2 / c^2}

d = (7.0ly) \sqrt{1-(0.9025c^2 / c^2}

d = (7.0ly) \sqrt{1-(0.9025)}

d = (7.0ly) \sqrt{0.0975}

d = (7.0ly)(0.3122)

t = 2.19ly


uranium_235 said:
(d ) what will the spacecraft occupants compute their speed to be from the results of (b ) and (c )?"

v = \frac{d}{t}

v = \frac{2.19ly}{2.3y }

v = 0.950c


Do you get it?
 
Last edited:
Do you get it?
Yes. I do get it.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top