B Answers to Beginner Questions about Black Hole Event Horizons

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter K. Doc Holiday
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beginner Stupid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses several fundamental questions about black holes and event horizons, noting that modern interpretations have shifted from Einstein's original concept of black holes. While the event horizon is often depicted as a sphere, this representation primarily applies to non-rotating black holes, and the presence of an accretion disk is not strictly necessary, as matter can enter from various angles. However, if sufficient matter falls in, it can lead to the formation of an accretion disk due to gravitational interactions. The relativistic jets emitted by black holes are believed to originate from the accretion disk and emerge from the magnetic poles, which align with the black hole's spin axis. Overall, the complexities of black hole structures challenge the feasibility of creating a single, detailed representation of all components involved.
K. Doc Holiday
Messages
32
Reaction score
13
I have searched the threads. Got some great insight but didn't find the answers to some of my questions

Questions about Event Horizons

Most of the textbooks and papers I have read no longer picture or talk about Einstein's original concept of a black hole; the Einstein - Rosen bridge. First question: is this universal?

Many texts say the event horizon is a sphere. Is this universally accepted? Or does it only apply to non rotating black holes?

Does an EH sphere eliminate the need for an accretion disk since matter can flow into a sphere from every angle?

Are black holes still considered "infinite singularities"? I ask because a sphere is finite with a measurable volume.

Does a 3 billion solar mass black hole like M87 have a greater volume than a 10 solar mass black hole?

Which sides of the sphere do the relativistic jets shoot out of?

If it isn't a sphere then where are the jets in relation to the accretion discs? Do the jets disrupt the disc?

All conceptual drawings I have seen leave out one or more components. Is it possible to fit all the components of a black hole theory into a single detailed drawing?

Thanks ahead of time for your patience.
Doc
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
K. Doc Holiday said:
Does an EH sphere eliminate the need for an accretion disk since matter can flow into a sphere from every angle?
There is no "need" for an accretion disc.
However, event horizon is small. If the infalling matter were in small amounts, most infalling particles would not fall in the black hole because they would pass the vicinity of black hole on hyperbolic or relativistic open orbits - only matter very directly falling towards the hole would enter the event horizon.
If larger amounts of matter fall in, particles near the black hole on a flyby may collide with other particles flying by black hole in different directions, be slowed down by such collision and caught into orbit around the hole.
Now, if there is some direction/half-plane in which slightly more matter happens to fall in than from other direction, the matter falling in from that direction would concentrate in an accretion disc. The matter falling in from other directions would be slowed down by colliding with accretion disc and would fall in the hole - only (some of the) matter in the disc would be left over orbiting.
 
The particles that comprise black hole jets are believed to originate from their accretion disc. The jets themselves emanate from the magnetic poles of a black hole where the magnetic field is weak enough to allow sufficiently energetic particles to escape - much like Earth's auroras originate from the magnetic poles of earth. The magnetic poles of Earth and black holes are aligned with their spin axis. See http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/11/what-powers-black-holes-mighty-jets for discussion
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top