Anti-Reflecting coatings on a glass lens

  • Thread starter Thread starter BananaMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Glass Lens
AI Thread Summary
To eliminate back reflection from a glass lens with an anti-reflection coating, the minimum coating thickness can be calculated using the principles of destructive interference. For a helium-neon laser at 632.8 nm, the thickness of the magnesium fluoride film should be one-quarter of the wavelength in the coating material, which is approximately 114 nm. The coating should ideally be applied to both the front and rear faces of the lens to achieve optimal performance and minimize reflections. Understanding thin film interference is crucial for determining the correct thickness and ensuring effective anti-reflection properties. Proper application of these principles will enhance the lens's optical performance.
BananaMan
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
heres the question:

anti-reflection coatings on a glass lens (n=1.50) consists of a magnesium fluoride (n=1.38) film, the coating thickness is chosen to eliminate any back reflectionusing the ideas of destructive interference. What is the minimum coating thickness required to eliminate the reflection from a helium-neon laser at 632.8nm? Should the coating be the same thickness on both the front and rear faces of the lens?

really don't have a clue where to go with this one, looked all through my notes for this and can't find anything on coatings, if someone could just point me in the right direction i should be able to do it? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thin film interference...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top