Anti-reflective coating optimum index of refraction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the optimum index of refraction for an antireflective coating on glass, specifically the equation n1=sqrt(n0ns), where n1 is the coating's index, n0 is air, and ns is glass. Participants express frustration in deriving this equation and achieving zero reflection, noting that it seems to require n0 to equal ns. One user mentions a textbook, "Optics" by Hecht, which contains a complicated derivation but is not easily applicable for normal incidence. The challenge lies in reconciling theoretical understanding with practical mathematical application. Overall, the conversation highlights the difficulties in understanding and applying the principles of antireflective coatings.
reb30
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello

I'm trying to solve a problem where I'm asked to find the optimum index of refraction for an antireflective coating on a piece of glass. In trying to derive an equation for it I keep coming across this in the internet (where 1,0, and s should be subscripts)

n1=sqrt(n0ns)

where n1 is the index of refraction of the coating, n0 is that of the air, and ns is the glass (see here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antireflection_coating) . I can't work out how this was derived for the life of me and can't find it anywhere in books or the internet. Does anyone have any ideas?

Thanks a lot

Robert
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I also have found this near impossible, despite spending hours working on it. My books quote that the relation given above should give zero reflection, but the only way I can make that happen is if n0 = ns.

I understand theoretically how and why this should work, I just can't get it to work mathematically..
 
@reb30:

I don't know if you own a copy of the textbook "Optics" by Hecht's but there's a derivation on page 375. Unfortuanatly it's very complicated and is done for general angle of incidence, rather than normal incidence. I couldn't make it work for simplified start conditions..
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top