Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Antiaromatic vs aromatic

  1. Feb 8, 2014 #1
    In aromatic compounds ,it is stabled because [itex]\pi[/itex] electrons are delocalised.But why in antiaromatic compounds delocalisation of [itex]\pi[/itex] electrons destablizes the compound and make it less stable than the corresponding single chain compound also. Should not the delocalisation have stabled it?
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 8, 2014 #2

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Delocalization also stabilizes anti-aromatic compounds, however, the statilization is not as large as in aromatic compounds. You also have to take in mind not only the absolute stability but also the stability relative to deformations leading away from equal bond lengths. For this, what is most relevant is the sigma system, not only the pi system.
    There exists voluminous literature on that topic, a nice read is e.g.:

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.20470/full
     
  4. Feb 8, 2014 #3
    That means delocalisation of [itex]\pi[/itex] electrons in sigma system does not stablize the system?
     
  5. Feb 8, 2014 #4

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    It does stabilize the system energetically but not necessarily geometrically.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Antiaromatic vs aromatic
Loading...