Any body is a theoritical biophysicist ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kieutridang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body
AI Thread Summary
To pursue a career as a theoretical biophysicist, a strong foundation in physics is essential, with an emphasis on classical and statistical physics. While some biology courses can be beneficial, they are not as critical as a solid physics background. Many computational biophysics groups also hire professionals from other disciplines, such as biology, chemistry, and engineering, due to a shortage of physicists. Specialized biophysics courses are available at some universities, but a standard physics degree is generally acceptable. A biophysics professor advises against taking biology classes, suggesting that self-study is sufficient for understanding biological processes. Overall, a focus on physics, supplemented by chemistry and biochemistry, is recommended for aspiring theoretical biophysicists.
kieutridang
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm still a student who is studying physics and I want to become a theoritical biophysicist, but I don't know what I need for this department.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A physics degree would be the mainstream route, possibly backed up with some biology courses (although a good understanding of classical and statistical physics is probably much more important than biology). Our computational biophysics groups also employs a handful of non-physicist (a biologist, a chemist, and an engineer). But that is mostly because a lack of suitable physicists on the market, not because of an intended interdisciplinarity. Some universities formally offer specialized biophysics courses, but if your university of choice doesn't, then a "normal" physics degree is probably just as fine, too.
 
I've been told by a biophysics professor at my university not to take any biology classes. - instead take chem and biochem. She says that she never even took any as a grad student because if you want to know how a protein is made, for example, you can just look it up in a book in 30 minutes instead of taking an entire class on it... Idk if I agree with this outlook. But basically what I'm trying to say is that you should be fine with physics
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top