Any good books on tensors/multilinear algebra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bda23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Books
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the search for high-quality tensor textbooks that emphasize practical applications in mechanics rather than purely mathematical theory. The individual seeking recommendations has a solid foundation in linear algebra and real analysis but prefers resources that present modern notation and a focus on applied mathematics. Key preferences include a general approach to tensors beyond Cartesian coordinates, an orientation towards engineers and physicists, and some inclusion of differential geometry, though not essential. Recommended titles include "An Introduction to Tensors and Group Theory for Physicists" by Nadir Jeevanjee and "A Student's Guide to Vectors and Tensors," both noted for their accessibility and positive reviews. "Tensor Analysis on Manifolds" by Bishop is also mentioned, with a focus on its clarity and application to mechanics, despite its rigorous and somewhat abstract nature. The final chapter of Bishop's book specifically addresses applications in mechanics, which aligns with the original request for practical insights.
bda23
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I have been dealing with tensors for quite a few years, working my way through a good number of different books on tensors. However, I keep getting frustrated at times at the low quality of many books. I have a good background in linear algebra and some real analysis, but I am not interested in tensors as a purely mathematical construct, but for applications in mechanics. What I am looking for would ideally include the following:

- some modern notation and orientation towards linear algebra. Not just the old component-based approach, which seems more like an exercise in algebraic manipulation, without gaining any understanding
- general tensors, not just Cartesian, ideally with some differential geometry applications
- not geared primarily towards mathematicians, as my knowledge of analysis is not quite good enough. Rather oriented towards applied mathematicians, physicists, engineers, i.e. not an entire book just listing theorems and proofs (they have to be included to some extent, of course, but not making up 100% of the content)
- perhaps some differential forms, but this is really not essential

Does anyone know of a suitable book? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An Introduction to Tensors and Group Theory for Physicists by Nadir Jeevanjee.
 
Thanks everyone, those books don't look too bad.

alissca123 said:
Have you tried Tensor Analysis on Manifolds by Bishop?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486640396/?tag=pfamazon01-20
I think it's a nice book (plus, it's Dover!)

I've heard of the book, but was unsure whether it was too theoretical/geared towards pure mathematicians. Would you say it also helps to develop some intuitive feeling/geometric view of tensors or is it rather leaning towards abstract algebra?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, the book is rigorous... and there are almost no diagrams, but I think it is very very clear (plus it's Dover! haha)
The final chapter is applications to mechanics.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top