Any mass accelarating @ 'c' is light

  • Thread starter Thread starter kittz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Mass
kittz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
""any mass accelerating @ 'c' is light ""

hii everyone, from E=mc^2 I've seen that "When mass accelerating @ c , its simply called energy".


( light speed is constant everywhere nothing can cross that limit. So, c^2 is considered as c , in fact c^2 is for dimensional accuracy)



so, my doubt is :When mass accl to 'C' , can we say that the resultant energy is LIGHT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If I understand your question correctly, no, mass doesn't turn into light when accelerated to the speed of light. Infact, they are two distinct realms. There are particles with mass that can never achieve the speed of light. Then there are particles, with photons being one example, that are massless that travel exclusively at the speed of light.
 


c2 isn't a speed. In conventional units, such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units" , which are handy for relativity, length and time are considered to have the same dimensionality, so c is a dimensionless constant. In geometric units, c is set equal to 1, so c2 also equals 1. But in other systems of units, c2 has a different numerical value to c as well as a different dimension.

As Pengwuino says, something is either traveling at speed c (as measured in what's called an "inertial frame of reference") or not. There's no way to accelerate from another speed to c, or from c to any other speed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top