Any numbers being Complex numbers

Anachronistic
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Are there any numbers that is not considered to be a subset of a complex number subset of

a + bi

Where a and b are real numbers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Define "number".

I'm asking because the concept of number is not well-defined in mathematics. There are a lot of things which carry the name "number", like real number, transfinite number, p-adic number, hyperreal number, etc. All these things are called numbers and often have no obvious relationship to each other. The concept of a number is too broad. It is not defined in mathematics.
 
Last edited:
I don't know as much as micromass on this subject, but I just read this on wikipedia and I think it might interest the OP.

On the wiki page of Number, it says under the header "Complex Numbers" the following:
Sets of numbers that are not subsets of the complex numbers are sometimes called hypercomplex numbers.
which is the same wording at the OP used, so maybe he chould check out hypercomplex numbers.
 
Numerical quantities described with vectors of more than two elements or tensors cannot, as a general rule, be described as complex numbers.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top