Can any subset from a set of {1,2,...,2n} contain two elements where one divides the other?

  • Thread starter Thread starter barbiemathgurl
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves selecting an (n+1) element subset from the set {1,2,...,2n} and demonstrating that at least one element divides another. The key insight is that each number can be expressed as 2^p * q, where p is a non-negative integer and q is an odd positive integer. By partitioning the set into n distinct subsets based on the odd component q, the pigeonhole principle ensures that at least two elements will fall into the same subset. This guarantees that one of these elements will divide the other. Thus, the proof confirms the existence of such a relationship within any chosen subset.
barbiemathgurl
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
i got this problem which is killin me :-p

given a set {1,2,...,2n} choose any (n+1) element subset, show there exists an element which divides another element.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What's the actual question? Are you asked to choose a subset of {1,2,...,2n} containing n+1 elements such that at least one element divides at least one other? I guess it isn't, since an answer to this is pretty obvious isn't it?
 
The problem is asking, I assume, that is you choose any n+1 element subset then there exists two elements a and b so that a|b.

Proof. Any number from {1,2,...,2n} can be uniquely expressed as 2^pq where p is a non-negative integer and q is an (odd) positive integer.
Define the sets:
T_1 = {2^p * 1 }
T_2 = {2^p * 2 }
...
T_n = {2^p * n}
So we partitioned the set into n sets. By the pigeonhole principle two elements end up in the same set T_j, but we purposely defined these sets in such a way so that one divides the other.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top