News JW v. Supreme Court: Unemployment Compensation for Religious Convictions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In 1981, JW sought a Supreme Court ruling regarding his entitlement to unemployment compensation after quitting his job at a machinery company due to his religious beliefs against working on military equipment. The case, Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, addressed whether religious convictions can constitute good cause for voluntary resignation. Participants in the discussion shared their search strategies for finding the case, emphasizing the importance of specific search terms. Additionally, the conversation touched on the 1980 Olympic boycott initiated by President Carter in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, with inquiries about related Supreme Court cases and the nature of the boycott as an executive decision. It was noted that while the athletes sought legal redress, the Supreme Court may not have heard their case, and there were references to President Reagan's involvement in the matter.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
JW in 1981 asked the Supreme Court to rule whether he was entitled to unemployment compensation. JW had worked for a machinery company and quit when his old job was eliminated, and he was transferred to fabricating gun turrets for tanks. He claimed religious convictions prevented him from working on war materials.

Does anyone recall the name of this case? I can't find it. :frown:

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you just know this case or was there a particular search method that you used to go through the cases?

Thanks again!
 
I vaguely remembered the case - but I used an effective google search with

"Jehovah's Witness","Supreme Court","military","1981" - I put that in the seach engine directly like that.

One has to be very specific when "looking for needles in a hay stack".

Quakers, Jehovah's Witnesses, and some other religious groups can obtain Conscientious Objector Status because they have a history of opposion war.
 
This is another case that I'm having trouble with.

President Carter in 1980 withdrew the US from the Olympics in protest against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. In 1981, irate athletes appealed to the Supreme Court for redress against a decision that denied them the right to earn a gold medal.

I tried searching with "1981", "Supreme Court", "Olympic athletes", and "redress," but I didn't come up with the case's name. By the way, was this withdrawal an executive action?

Thanks for any help.
 
Carter made the decision to boycott the 1980 Olympics, so it was an "executive decision". However, I could not find the case in the Supreme Court. Are you sure that it got to the Supreme Court? They may have dismissed it.

I think Reagan had some involvement in this during 1981. He apparently had several reversals for and against the boycott, but apparently decided in favor of President Carter's position.
 
This is a case the Court rejected, but so was Tileston v. Ullman.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
38
Views
7K
Replies
49
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top