Do I Need to Take Calculus II at MIT if I Get a 5 on AP Calculus BC?

AI Thread Summary
A score of 5 on the AP Calculus BC exam may exempt students from taking Calculus II at MIT, as the course Math 18.01 is considered equivalent to Calculus I and II combined. However, for students majoring in mathematics, a deeper understanding of calculus is recommended, suggesting they should take courses like 18.014 and 18.024, which focus on calculus with theory. While AP calculus provides a foundational understanding suitable for fields like economics or chemistry, it often lacks the rigor of proofs and deeper mathematical thinking, which are essential for more advanced studies in mathematics.
Nerd10
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
If I get a 5 on AP Calculus BC, do I still have to take Calculus II at MIT? Or I don't have to take it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A Google search on "MIT advanced placement" led me (after a couple of clicks) to this page:

http://web.mit.edu/firstyear/2017/subjects/incomingcredit/ap.html#math

Math 18.01 appears to be equivalent to most other schools' Calculus I + II, as the next course is 18.02, multivariable calculus.
 
Thank you.
 
Nerd10 said:
If I get a 5 on AP Calculus BC, do I still have to take Calculus II at MIT? Or I don't have to take it?

If you're planning on majoring in math then a 5 on Calc BC shows nothing about whether you have learned calculus. You would want to take 18.014 and 18.024 at MIT, Calculus with Theory. If you can understand Apostol or Spivak and do the problems, then you don't need MIT's calculus classes.

AP level understanding is good enough if you're going to be an economist or a chemist, where you don't have to really understand the math, but just be able to use it as a tool.

The basic problem with AP level high school calculus is that it skips the proofs and real mathematical thinking and just teaches you a bunch of techniques. Sometimes you get better, but as it's not necessary for the AP test that takes an exceptional teacher.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top