Aphelion/Perihelion of Halleys comet

  • Thread starter Thread starter zanazzi78
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comet
zanazzi78
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
Q.Halley's comet is in an elliptic orbit about the sun. The orbit eccentricity is 0.967 and the period is 76 years. Taking the mass of the sun to be 2 \times 10^30 kg abd the usual value of G, determine the max and min distances of the comet from the sun.
Now I've worked out teh answers but they differ from the values I've found on the net,(my guess is the value I've used for the solar mass isn't very accurate!) so would you mind taking a second to have a look at what I've done to see if I'm correct.
A.
using...
a=( \frac{GM_{\odot}T^2}{4 \Pi ^2})^\frac{1}{3}
i got
a= \sqrt[3]{ \frac{ (6.67 \times 10^-11 )( 2 \times 10^30 )( 2.4 \times 10^9)^2}{4 \Pi^2}}<br /> = 2.01 \times 10^9 m<br />
from
e= \frac{a-R_{min}}{a}<br />
<br /> R_{min} = 6.633\times1 0^6<br />
then to get R_max i used
<br /> R_{max} = 2a - R_{min}<br /> = (2)(2.01\times10^9) - (6.633\times 10^6)<br /> = 2.666\times 10^{16} m<br />
the problem is i`ve found a value for R_min = 8.9x10^10 and R_max = 5.3x10^12 !
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zanazzi78 said:
a= \sqrt[3]{ \frac{ (6.67 \times 10^-11 )( 2 \times 10^30 )( 2.4 \times 10^9)^2}{4 \Pi^2}}<br /> = 2.01 \times 10^9 m<br />

Check that calculation again. You have a power (-11 + 30 + 18)/3, it should be in the power 12 range.
 
I`m blind to my own ignorance, thank you for pionting out the error.
 
I am trying to figure out the speed of Halley's Comet in km/sec. at aphelion and perihelion

I am using

v² = (4Π²a³) / (P²) * ((2/r) - (1/a))

where a = mean distance from the sun (semimajor axis of the ellipse)
P= sidereal period (75 years)
r = distance of the object from the Sun at a given instant

a=16.8 A.U. c=16 A.U.

"r" at perihelion = a-c "r" at aphelion = a + c
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top