Programs Applicant for Physics PhD Programs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating a friend's graduate school application profile for a Physics PhD, particularly in light of his impressive academic background, including acceptance to both Harvard and Caltech. The individual is curious about how this profile compares to other applicants, especially given the unique choice of attending Caltech for its scientific approach. Concerns about privacy and appropriateness of sharing the friend's resume for critique are raised, emphasizing the importance of honesty in academic resumes, especially in scientific fields where credentials can be easily verified. The conversation highlights the significance of GPA and research experience in graduate applications, while also noting that the standards for evaluating applicants can vary significantly across disciplines.
Anonymous217
Messages
355
Reaction score
2
Hi there. I have a friend who's currently in Caltech and is applying to various graduate schools to pursue a Physics PhD. I'm practically in the same path as he is, but I'm a senior applying to undergraduate schools as a Physics major (although I might go for a Math PhD instead). He gave me a link that was basically a resume and it looked absolutely astounding. However, I have no idea how to compare it to other graduate applicants.
Here's the link: (removed)

As a high school senior, he got accepted into Harvard and Caltech, but he opted for Caltech (which is a very uncommon thing to do) because of the scientist-esque approach that Caltech has on its courses and etc. Based purely on this and not on any scores, how strong does he look as a graduate applicant? He applied to a lot of the top schools and a few safeties.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think posting someone else's CV for critique is appropriate. There are certainly privacy issues.

One thing that did occur to me in reading it - in business, it may be acceptable to "pad" your resume. In science, one should never do this, particularly if it is easily checked.
 
Sorry if posting his resume isn't allowed on these forums. He let me do it though so I don't think I breached any privacy rights in that regard. Everything he put was truthful (that's what he told me anyways); I thought his GPA in Caltech and his research were pretty good anyways. I was just wondering how it would look in critique of actual Physics/Math PhDs who already know how the system works basically.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top