Application of Calculus in Non Continuous Physical Systems

AI Thread Summary
Calculus is traditionally based on the assumption of continuity, yet its application in physics persists despite the discontinuous nature of matter. The discussion highlights the tension between the belief that calculus is inappropriate for analyzing systems like gravitation and electromagnetism, and the counterargument that calculus has proven effective in these areas. Critics of the discontinuity argument assert that the behavior of atoms does not negate the utility of calculus in modeling physical phenomena. Furthermore, no specific examples were provided to demonstrate that calculus leads to erroneous results in these contexts. The debate underscores the complexity of applying mathematical principles to the physical world.
Phynite
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In the mathematics of Calculus, a basic requirement is that the system or function should be continuous. Until the discovery that matter is discontinuous, applying Calculus in Physics was reasonable. But why is it still applied almost everywhere in physics ? Won't such applications produce erroneous results ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which matter is discontinuous? Do you have specific examples in mind?
 
SteamKing said:
Which matter is discontinuous? Do you have specific examples in mind?

Does it mean that some form of matter is continuous ? Matter, as we all know, is made up of atoms. So it is discrete and discontinuous. So I believe that application of Calculus is inappropriate in areas like Gravitation, Electromagnetism and Nuclear Physics.
 
Well, I can't argue with your beliefs, but I reject them. Application of the calculus to the problems you mention has been quite successful. You assume that atoms behave independently regardless of circumstances. Your assumption that the calculus can deal only with mathematically continuous systems is also faulty. You also have not provided any examples, according to your hypothesis, that application of the calculus has provided faulty results when used to analyze physical phenomena.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top