Applied or Pure Math: Which is More Beneficial for a Chemistry Major?

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between applied and pure math as a concentration for a math and chemistry major involves weighing the practical benefits against theoretical interests. Applied math is highlighted as more beneficial for a career in chemistry, with a focus on classes like Advanced Calculus, Numerical Analysis, and Probability and Statistics. These courses are seen as directly applicable to chemistry. In contrast, while pure math offers interesting theoretical insights through courses like Analysis II, Complex Analysis, and Topology, it is viewed as less useful for practical applications in chemistry. The discussion suggests that unless there is a strong personal interest in theoretical concepts, applied math is the recommended path for those aiming for a career in chemistry.
ptolema
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I'm just starting out right now as a math and chemistry major. Should I choose applied or pure math as my concentration? I've been told that applied math will help me with chem, and I agree. However, I also feel comfortable with the theoretical side of things, and it's a large part of what draws me to math. My ultimate career goal is in chemistry; what are the applications/benefits of pure math vs applied math in chem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the classes you would take in pure math vs the classes you would take in applied?
 
I need to take the Calc series, Diff Eq, Linear Algebra, and Analysis I for both. For pure math, I would take Analysis II, Complex Analysis, Modern Algebra, and Topology. For applied math, I would take Advanced Calc, Numerical Analysis, and Probability and Stats I.
 
Applied math would be FAR more benificial for you. Don't get me wrong, pure math is interesting, but it's pretty useless to you. Take it if you find it interesting, but applied math is what might help you later.
 
The most I can see the pure math helping you is that things like finite group representation theory might come up in some advanced chemistry (I'm unfamiliar with the details).

Realistically, most of a pure math degree won't be useful to you in any direct way.
 
deRham said:
The most I can see the pure math helping you is that things like finite group representation theory might come up in some advanced chemistry (I'm unfamiliar with the details).

Realistically, most of a pure math degree won't be useful to you in any direct way.

Alright, thanks!
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top