Applied or Pure Math: Which is More Beneficial for a Chemistry Major?

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between applied and pure math as a concentration for a math and chemistry major involves weighing the practical benefits against theoretical interests. Applied math is highlighted as more beneficial for a career in chemistry, with a focus on classes like Advanced Calculus, Numerical Analysis, and Probability and Statistics. These courses are seen as directly applicable to chemistry. In contrast, while pure math offers interesting theoretical insights through courses like Analysis II, Complex Analysis, and Topology, it is viewed as less useful for practical applications in chemistry. The discussion suggests that unless there is a strong personal interest in theoretical concepts, applied math is the recommended path for those aiming for a career in chemistry.
ptolema
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I'm just starting out right now as a math and chemistry major. Should I choose applied or pure math as my concentration? I've been told that applied math will help me with chem, and I agree. However, I also feel comfortable with the theoretical side of things, and it's a large part of what draws me to math. My ultimate career goal is in chemistry; what are the applications/benefits of pure math vs applied math in chem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the classes you would take in pure math vs the classes you would take in applied?
 
I need to take the Calc series, Diff Eq, Linear Algebra, and Analysis I for both. For pure math, I would take Analysis II, Complex Analysis, Modern Algebra, and Topology. For applied math, I would take Advanced Calc, Numerical Analysis, and Probability and Stats I.
 
Applied math would be FAR more benificial for you. Don't get me wrong, pure math is interesting, but it's pretty useless to you. Take it if you find it interesting, but applied math is what might help you later.
 
The most I can see the pure math helping you is that things like finite group representation theory might come up in some advanced chemistry (I'm unfamiliar with the details).

Realistically, most of a pure math degree won't be useful to you in any direct way.
 
deRham said:
The most I can see the pure math helping you is that things like finite group representation theory might come up in some advanced chemistry (I'm unfamiliar with the details).

Realistically, most of a pure math degree won't be useful to you in any direct way.

Alright, thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top