Applying rules to simplify a 3 x 3 determinant

PcumP_Ravenclaw
Messages
105
Reaction score
4
I have attached the properties/rules that will aid in simplifying the 3 x 3 determinant so that it can be calculated with minimum effort. I am trying to understand rule (2) and (4). I am not so clear about the idea of linearity. Can anyone please explain these two rules with regards to example 4.6.6 in the attachment?

Danke..
 

Attachments

  • determinants.jpg
    determinants.jpg
    50.1 KB · Views: 420
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For (2), what happens to the determinant if you multiply one row by a constant M.

Start with

A B C
D E F
G H J

Then multiply one row by M

A B C
MD ME MF
G H J

for example. What happens to the determinant? Linear means this multiplies the determinant by the same M.

As to (4), what it is saying is, if you add some multiple of row 2 to row 1, for example, it will not change the determinant. This is related to (3).
 
  • Like
Likes PcumP_Ravenclaw
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top