Approaching vehicles with acceleration

AI Thread Summary
Two vehicles, A and B, are approaching each other, with A moving at a constant velocity and B accelerating from an initial velocity. The distance between them at time t=0 is D, leading to the equation D = v_At + v_Bt + (1/2)at². The discussion reveals that this equation can be rearranged into a standard quadratic form: (1/2)at² + (v_A + v_B)t - D = 0. Participants confirm that the quadratic formula can be applied to solve for t, ensuring to consider only the positive solution for time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the coefficients for the quadratic formula.
JohnnyGui
Messages
796
Reaction score
51

Homework Statement


Two vehicles, A and B, are approaching each other. Vehicle A has a constant velocity of ##v_A##. Vehicle B has a constant acceleration ##a## with an initial velocity of ##v_B##. The starting distance at ##t=0## between them is ##D##.

Is there a way to solve at what time ##t## they'd meet?

Homework Equations



##D = v_At + v_Bt + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a \cdot t^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


I deduced the equation above but I can't find a way to solve for t. Simplifying gives:

##\frac{D}{t} = v_A + v_B + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a \cdot t##

Is there a way to solve for t without plotting these two equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JohnnyGui said:

Homework Statement


Two vehicles, A and B, are approaching each other. Vehicle A has a constant velocity of ##v_A##. Vehicle B has a constant acceleration ##a## with an initial velocity of ##v_B##. The starting distance at ##t=0## between them is ##D##.

Is there a way to solve at what time ##t## they'd meet?

Homework Equations



##D = v_At + v_Bt + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a \cdot t^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


I deduced the equation above but I can't find a way to solve for t. Simplifying gives:

##\frac{D}{t} = v_A + v_B + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a \cdot t##

Is there a way to solve for t without plotting these two equations?

It is just a quadratic equation in ##t##, so is easily solved using the standard quadratic-solution formulas.
 
Your equation looks very like a quadratic in ##t## to me!
 
PeroK said:
Your equation looks very like a quadratic in ttt to me!

Ray Vickson said:
It is just a quadratic equation in ttt, so is easily solved using the standard quadratic-solution formulas.

Ah, for some reason I thought this wasn't possible because there are two parameters with either a ##t## or a ##\frac{1}{t}## in it. But after looking at it I noticed it could be written as:

##\frac{1}{2} \cdot at^2 + (v_A + v_B)t - D = 0##

And then use the abc-formula in which ##a=\frac{1}{2}\cdot a## and ##b=(v_A + v_B)## and ##c = D##. Is this correct?
 
JohnnyGui said:
Ah, for some reason I thought this wasn't possible because there are two parameters with either a ##t## or a ##\frac{1}{t}## in it. But after looking at it I noticed it could be written as:

##\frac{1}{2} \cdot at^2 + (v_A + v_B)t - D = 0##

And then use the abc-formula in which ##a=\frac{1}{2}\cdot a## and ##b=(v_A + v_B)## and ##c = D##. Is this correct?

You already had the quadratic in section 2 of your original post.

I guess you mean ##c = -D##?

You may like to think what difference it makes if vehicle A is at rest and vehicle B is initially moving at the combined speed ##v_a + v_b##.
 
PeroK said:
You already had the quadratic in section 2 of your original post.

I guess you mean ##c = -D##?

You may like to think what difference it makes if vehicle A is at rest and vehicle B is initially moving at the combined speed ##v_a + v_b##.
Apologies, I did mean ##c = -D##. I take it you mean that I could just put the equation in section 2 in parentheses? My initial target was to use the abc-formula to only give the positive solution of ##t##.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top