Approximating Binomial Series I'm so close

  • Thread starter Thread starter sami23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around using the Binomial Series to approximate the square root of 35 with a specified accuracy. The original poster attempts to apply the binomial expansion to the expression for sqrt(35) but encounters issues with the accuracy of their approximation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes their method of rewriting sqrt(35) and applying the binomial series, but questions the accuracy of their approximation after using several terms. Other participants point out potential errors in the formula used and the nature of the series, suggesting that the series should alternate in sign and that the binomial coefficients may have been miscalculated.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's approach, providing feedback on the correctness of the formula and the series expansion. There is a recognition of differing interpretations of the series, and some guidance is offered regarding the proper form of the binomial series.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that their professor did not cover the alternating series estimation theorem, which they believe could assist in determining the number of terms needed for the desired accuracy. This lack of coverage may influence their understanding of the problem.

sami23
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
Use Binomial Series to approximate sqrt(35) with an accuracy of 10^(-7)

Formulas for binomial series: (1-x)^r and sum{from 0 to n}(r k)(x)^k

sqrt(35) = sqrt(35*36/36) = 6*sqrt(35/36) = 6*sqrt(1-(1/36))

Now it looks more like the binomial series formula:
let r = 1/2 because of the radical and x = 1/36

6*[1-(1/36)]^(1/2) and use the second formula to expand:

6* sum{from 0 to n}(1/2 k)(1/36)^k

I did from k=0 to k=5:
= 6[1-(1/2)*(1/36)+(1/8)*(1/36)^2-(1/16)*(1/36)^3+(1/32)*(1/36)^4-(1/64)*(1/36)^5+...]

But I didn't get close enough with only 5 terms. First I used 4 terms because (1/32)*(1/36)^4 gave me 1.9*10^(-8) which I thought would be enough terms needed for an accuracy of 10^(-7) but wasn't.

I eventually got 6[0.98620624] = 5.917237444
and the actual sqrt(35) = 5.916079783

+- 0.001 and I need +- 0.0000001
My professor didn't teach us to use the alternating series estimation theorem which I though would help me find how many n terms I would need to use but I don't understand. Please help. I think I'm on the right track I'm just not quite there.

Thanks,
Sami
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have used an incorrect formula
The correct one is:
[tex](1-x)^{\alpha}=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}(-1)^k\[\left(\begin{array}{c}\alpha & k \end{array}\right)x^k\][/tex]

where
[tex]\[\left(\begin{array}{c}\alpha & k \end{array}\right)=\frac{1}{r!}{\prod_{j=0}^{r-1}{(\alpha-j)}}\][/tex]
 
eys_physics is correct. The series isn't alternating. And starting at the (1/36)^4 term your binomial coefficients aren't correct either. I think you just extrapolated from the form of the earlier terms. Wrongly. What you've got going there is a geometric series. If that were correct you could sum it and show sqrt(35) is rational (?).
 
(35) = sqrt(35*36/36) = 6*sqrt(35/36)
6*sqrt(35/36) = 6[(1 - 1/36)^(1/2)] =

from k=0 to k=4:
= 6[(1 + (1/2)*(1/36) - (1/8)*(1/36)^2 + (1/16)*(1/36)^3 - (5/128)*(1/36)^4]

= 6.082762528 which is different from sqrt(35) = 5.916079783

I got a different series after calculating for the binomial. I calculated up to k=4 because the last term was 2.3*10^(-8) and it wanted an accuracy of 10^(-7).
 
Notice the (-1)^k in the formula eys_physics posted. Also notice the binomial coefficients generally alternate in sign. Most of the terms in your series should have the same sign.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K