MHB Arc length & similar questions

fluffertoes
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello! I really don't understand this concept, and I have an example problem that I am working on that I just CANNOT figure out! Any help? Thanks so much in advance! A group of people get on a pirate ship ride at the fair. This ride is a swinging pendulum with a maximum swing angle of 65 degrees from the center of the ship in either direction. The arm of the pendulum holding the ship has a 40 ft radius and the ship is 22 feet long with the last seats positioned 1 foot from the end of the ship.
What is the arc length traveled by the center of the ship between the two maximum points?
ALSO>>>>
What is the maximum height reached by the center of the ship? I attached a picture for reference! Thanks so much! :)View attachment 6233
 

Attachments

  • rsz_1pirate_ship.jpg
    rsz_1pirate_ship.jpg
    11.5 KB · Views: 113
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
fluffertoes said:
Hello! I really don't understand this concept, and I have an example problem that I am working on that I just CANNOT figure out! Any help? Thanks so much in advance! A group of people get on a pirate ship ride at the fair. This ride is a swinging pendulum with a maximum swing angle of 65 degrees from the center of the ship in either direction. The arm of the pendulum holding the ship has a 40 ft radius and the ship is 22 feet long with the last seats positioned 1 foot from the end of the ship.
I found that the arc length traveled by the center of the ship between the two maximum points is 40 feet. Is this correct?
ALSO>>>>
What is the maximum height reached by the center of the ship? I attached a picture for reference! Thanks so much! :)

Between the two maximum points, an angle of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 130^{\circ} \end{align*}$ is swept out, so the arclength would be

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{l} &= \frac{130}{360} \cdot 2\,\pi \cdot 45\,\textrm{ft} \\ &= \frac{65\,\pi}{2} \,\textrm{ft} \\ &\approx 102.1\,\textrm{ft} \end{align*}$
 
Prove It said:
Between the two maximum points, an angle of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 130^{\circ} \end{align*}$ is swept out, so the arclength would be

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{l} &= \frac{130}{360} \cdot 2\,\pi \cdot 45\,\textrm{ft} \\ &= \frac{65\,\pi}{2} \,\textrm{ft} \\ &\approx 102.1\,\textrm{ft} \end{align*}$

The radius is 40 feet, not 45 feet. So technically wouldn't the arc length end up being (in terms of pi (π)):

l=130/360⋅ (2π⋅40ft) = 260π/9 feet
 
Yes:

$$s=r\theta=\left(40\text{ ft}\right)\left(2\cdot65^{\circ}\frac{\pi}{180^{\circ}}\right)=\frac{260\pi}{9}\,\text{ft}\approx90.76\text{ ft}$$

To find the maximum height (above the lowest point) of the middle of the ship, we can observe that the height $h$ of the ship in terms of the angular displacement $\theta$ is given by:

$$h=r(1-\cos(\theta))$$

So, use $r=40\text{ ft}$ and $\theta=65^{\circ}$ in the above formula to get the maximum height of the center of the ship. :D
 
MarkFL said:
Yes:

$$s=r\theta=\left(40\text{ ft}\right)\left(2\cdot65^{\circ}\frac{\pi}{180^{\circ}}\right)=\frac{260\pi}{9}\,\text{ft}\approx90.76\text{ ft}$$

To find the maximum height (above the lowest point) of the middle of the ship, we can observe that the height $h$ of the ship in terms of the angular displacement $\theta$ is given by:

$$h=r(1-\cos(\theta))$$

So, use $r=40\text{ ft}$ and $\theta=65^{\circ}$ in the above formula to get the maximum height of the center of the ship. :D

So would that leave me with:

(40)Cos(65°) = 16.9
40 - 16.9 = 23.095 feet
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top