How Do You Add Arccos(x), Arccos(y), and Arccos(z)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trepidation
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how to add arccosine functions, specifically arccos(x) + arccos(y) and arccos(x) + arccos(y) + arccos(z). The participants clarify that x, y, and z are arbitrary variables, not tied to specific coordinates on the unit circle. The derived formula for the sum of two arccosines is arccos(xy - √((1-x²)(1-y²))). For three variables, the formula expands to arccos(xyz - z√((1-x²)(1-y²)) - y√((1-z²)(1-x²)) - x√((1-y²)(1-z²))). The discussion concludes with a mathematical breakdown of the cosine of the sum of angles.
Trepidation
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
arccos(x) + arccos(y) = ?

How are these added? I can't find it anywhere, and I'm sure there has to be a way...


Actually, what would be more helpful would be
arccos(x) + arccos(y) + arccos(z)

Or even
cos(x) + cos(y) + cox(z)


Well... Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Please elaborate. Are x and y arbitrary? Do they represent a coordinate pair on the unit circle?
 
x and y (and z, if you care to answer the other parts) are arbitrary variables; they have nothing to do with any coordinates.
 
Take the cosine (or sine) of both sides of the equation.
 
OK if my math is correct then
arccos(x) + arccos(y) = arccos( xy - \sqrt{(1-x^2)(1-y^2)})

Yea that should be right.
 
Last edited:
I think it's correct.

and

\arccos (x) + \arccos (y) + \arccos (z) =<br /> \arccos(xyz - z \sqrt{(1-x^2)(1-y^2)} - x \sqrt{(1-y^2)(1-z^2)} - y \sqrt{(1-z^2)(1-x^2)})

Let X=\arccos(x), Y=\arccos(y), Z=\arccos(z) then

\cos(X+Y+Z) = \cos(X+Y) \cos(Z) - \sin(X+Y) \sin(Z)
<br /> = (\cos(X) \cos(Y) - \sin(X) \sin(Y)) \cos(Z) - (\sin(X) \cos(Y) + \cos(X) \sin(Y)) \sin(X) <br /> = ...
= xyz - z \sqrt{(1-x^2)(1-y^2)} -y \sqrt{(1-z^2)(1-x^2)} - x \sqrt{(1-y^2)(1-z^2)}
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top