Archer on a Cliff: Can Arrow Reach Mark?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dboy83
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An archer on a 100m high cliff aims to hit a target 430m away from the base. Shooting horizontally at 35 m/s will not reach the mark due to insufficient horizontal distance covered before hitting the ground. To determine the necessary initial speed for a horizontal shot to reach the target, kinematic equations are applied, specifically relating vertical displacement and time of flight. The equation 0.5*g*t^2=100 is used to find the time of flight, with gravity as a positive value since the arrow falls downward. Correctly solving for time and substituting it back into the horizontal motion equation will reveal if the target can be hit.
dboy83
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
An archer stands on a cliff that is 100m high, shooting at a mark on the ground below 430m away from the bottom of the (vertical) cliff. The archer is capable of shooting an arrow with an initial speed of 35 m/s at any angle you choose.

A) If the archer shoots horizontally ( at an angle of zero degrees with respect to the horizontal), will the arrow reach the mark? why? If not, will shooting at any angle above the horizontal help? Why or why not?

B) What initial speed of the arrow is needed to be in order for the arrow to reach the target mark ( still with an angle of zero degrees)?:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show your work so far. What equations of motion apply to this problem?
 
Just some hints, use your kinematics equations, the 4 equations. And the time for vertical motion and horizontal motion is the same.

Hope it helps
 
lost...

berkeman said:
You need to show your work so far. What equations of motion apply to this problem?


I don't know which one to use. Where do i start? Please somebody help.
 
what formula

dboy83 said:
An archer stands on a cliff that is 100m high, shooting at a mark on the ground below 430m away from the bottom of the (vertical) cliff. The archer is capable of shooting an arrow with an initial speed of 35 m/s at any angle you choose.

A) If the archer shoots horizontally ( at an angle of zero degrees with respect to the horizontal), will the arrow reach the mark? why? If not, will shooting at any angle above the horizontal help? Why or why not?

B) What initial speed of the arrow is needed to be in order for the arrow to reach the target mark ( still with an angle of zero degrees)?:smile:


does anybody know what formula I am supposed to use?
 
What is the equation that relates changes in velocity to the initial velocity and the acceleration? What is the slightly longer equation that relates changes in position to initial position, initial velocity, and acceleration?
 
The velocity in the x direction is constant and it equals the initial velocity v0 = 35 m/s. The y direction velocity equals gt. Hence, the path in the x direction equals v0*t = 35*t (1), and in the y direction 0.5*g*t^2. Now if the arrow falls to the ground, the path that it has to cross in the y direction equals 100 m, so 0.5*g*t^2=100. Solving this equation gives us the time t of the flight of the arrow. Putting that time into equation (1) gives us the x displacement of the arrow, so we can tell if it has his the target or not.
 
hmm

radou said:
The velocity in the x direction is constant and it equals the initial velocity v0 = 35 m/s. The y direction velocity equals gt. Hence, the path in the x direction equals v0*t = 35*t (1), and in the y direction 0.5*g*t^2. Now if the arrow falls to the ground, the path that it has to cross in the y direction equals 100 m, so 0.5*g*t^2=100. Solving this equation gives us the time t of the flight of the arrow. Putting that time into equation (1) gives us the x displacement of the arrow, so we can tell if it has his the target or not.

You guys make it look so easy... Ok, so 0.5*g*t^2=100

I plug in -9.80 for g and multiply that by 0.5, which gives me -4.9.
so I could rewrite the equation as -4.9*t^2=100 If I try to solve for t I get the square root of a negative number which is not possible. ?
 
I'm thinking

dboy83 said:
You guys make it look so easy... Ok, so 0.5*g*t^2=100

I plug in -9.80 for g and multiply that by 0.5, which gives me -4.9.
so I could rewrite the equation as -4.9*t^2=100 If I try to solve for t I get the square root of a negative number which is not possible. ?

is 0.5*g*t^2=100 supposed to be 0.5*g*t^2=-100 ? ( the only difference is the negative sign in the 100.
 
  • #10
dboy83 said:
is 0.5*g*t^2=100 supposed to be 0.5*g*t^2=-100 ? ( the only difference is the negative sign in the 100.

The ball is 'falling down', so gravity is positive.
 
  • #11
radou said:
The ball is 'falling down', so gravity is positive.
Yeah, the acceleration and velocity and displacement are all in the same direction, so everything is positive.
 
Back
Top