Archimedes principle problem? *1 fluid, 1 solid*

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem applying Archimedes' principle to determine how far the bottom face of a floating wooden cube is submerged in a liquid. The wooden cube has a density of 762 kg/m^3 and dimensions of 12 mm, while the liquid has a density of 1296 kg/m^3. The key equations involve the balance of forces, where the buoyant force equals the weight of the displaced liquid. The participant attempts to relate the buoyant force to the volume and density of both the wood and the liquid, seeking clarification on the correct approach. The hint emphasizes understanding the volume of liquid displaced to support the wood, indicating a relationship between the densities and volumes involved.
jrrodri7
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble arriving at a finalized answer dealing with the sum of the forces with this problem dealing with Archimedes principle (buoyancy is weight of the displacement).

Here's the question:

A cube of wood whose edge is 12 mm is floating in a liquid in a glass with one of its faces parallel to the liquid surface. The density of wood is 762 kg/m^3, that of liquid is 1296 kg/m^3. How far (h) below the liquid surface is the bottom face of the cube?


Relevant equations

\Sigma F = ma = 0 (it's floating)

\rho = F / A

Here's what I tried doing.

\Sigma F_y = B - F_l - F_w = 0 , with B as Buoyancy, F_l is the liquids force, and the F_w is the forceo f the wood . I ended up using Volume and density to plug in for Forces obtaining this...

\rho * V_l * g - \rho * V_w = \rho * V_w * H

I'm not sure if this is near the correct approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The buoyant force is the force of the liquid on the wood. Only two forces act on the wood: its weight and the buoyant force.

Hint: What volume of liquid must be displaced to support the wood? How does that compare to the volume of the wood?
 
Oh, so it's similar to the case of the fully sugmerged object, only with different densities given and g is negligible.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top