Arclength Math Question: Find a Closed Form Expression for x(t) and y(t)

[foxjwill]

Homework Statement

Given r(t) = x(t)\textbf{i} + y(t)\textbf{j} and

\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| d\tau = t.

find, if possible, a closed form expression for x(t) and y(t).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I started by applying the fundamental theorem of calculus

\left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\|=1

then evaluated and simplified and got

x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 = 1.

Is it possible to continue from here?

 

[e(ho0n3]

How are you getting x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 = 1?

 

[Astronuc]

I started by applying the fundamental theorem of calculus

\left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\|=1

Not sure how you determined this from the fundamental theorem.

x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 = 1. This applies to a unit circle.


Why t in this equation?
\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| d\tau = t.

The integral should provide length, not time.

 

[foxjwill]

Not sure how you determined this from the fundamental theorem.

x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 = 1. This applies to a unit circle.

Oops. I meant

x'(t)^2 + y'(t)^2 = 1.

As to how I got there:
\frac{d}{dt}\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| d\tau = \frac{dt}{dt}

\left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| = 1

\sqrt{x'(t)^2 + y'(t)^2} = 1

x'(t)^2 + y'(t)^2 = 1.

Why t in this equation?
\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| d\tau = t.

I'm basically trying to find some vector-valued function r(t) in \texttt{r}^2 such that \forall t, s(t) = t, where s(t) is arclength.

 

[e(ho0n3]

Oops. I meant

x'(t)^2 + y'(t)^2 = 1.

That's better. You can play around with this by integrating with respect to t. However, you have two unknowns and one equation. I suspect that, without some additional assumptions, you won't be able to determine x(t) and y(t).

As to how I got there:
\frac{d}{dt}\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| d\tau = \frac{dt}{dt}

Err, why would you do that? Since the integrator is d\tau, you can take |dr/dt| out because it doesn't involve \tau.

 

[e(ho0n3]

I'm basically trying to find some vector-valued function r(t) in \texttt{r}^2 such that \forall t, s(t) = t, where s(t) is arclength.

This makes no sense to me. Where did s(t) come from? How are you going from a vector-valued function r(t) to a scalar-valued function s(t)?

 

[foxjwill]

Err, why would you do that? Since the integrator is d\tau, you can take |dr/dt| out because it doesn't involve \tau.

Again, a mistake. >_<
\frac{d}{dt}\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{d\tau}\right\| d\tau = \frac{dt}{dt}

This makes no sense to me. Where did s(t) come from? How are you going from a vector-valued function r(t) to a scalar-valued function s(t)?

s(t) := \int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{d\tau}\right\| d\tau

 

[e(ho0n3]

Again, a mistake. >_<
\frac{d}{dt}\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{d\tau}\right\| d\tau = \frac{dt}{dt}

I will assume that the derivative inside the integral is d/d\tau r(\tau) for otherwise the integral would evaluate to 0.

The integral pretty ugly. Taking the derivative of the integral with respect to t doesn't help.

 

[HallsofIvy]

Yes, it does. By the fundamental theorem, mentioned before,
\left|\left|\frac{dr}{dt}\right|\right|= 1&lt;br /&gt; just as he said before. That gives, just as he said before, &lt;br /&gt; \left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)= 1[/itex].&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; In fact, that trajectory &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;is&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; the unit circle.

 

[e(ho0n3]

If you bring the d/dt inside the integral and evaluate the inside of the integral before integrating, then since the integrand is with respect to tau, the derivative with respect to t will be 0.

Am I missing something?

 

[foxjwill]

If you bring the d/dt inside the integral and evaluate the inside of the integral before integrating, then since the integrand is with respect to tau, the derivative with respect to t will be 0.

Am I missing something?

Yes, the fundamental theorem of calculus which says

\frac{d}{dx}\int_a^x f(t) dt = f(x)

where a is some constant.



\int_a^x f(t) dt is a function of x. In other words, you can't bring the \frac{d}{dx} inside the integral because that would be like saying \frac{d}{dx}\left [x^2\right] = \left[\frac{d}{dx}(x)\right]^2, which is obviously untrue.

 

[e(ho0n3]

Right. So it does simplify to x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 = 1. Thus, x(t) = cos t and y(t) = sin t is a possible solution right?