Arclength Math Question: Find a Closed Form Expression for x(t) and y(t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter foxjwill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arclength
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
11 replies · 3K views
foxjwill
Messages
350
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given [tex]r(t) = x(t)\textbf{i} + y(t)\textbf{j}[/tex] and

[tex]\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| d\tau = t.[/tex]

find, if possible, a closed form expression for x(t) and y(t).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I started by applying the fundamental theorem of calculus

[tex]\left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\|=1[/tex]

then evaluated and simplified and got

[tex]x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 = 1.[/tex]

Is it possible to continue from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are you getting [itex]x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 = 1[/itex]?
 
foxjwill said:
I started by applying the fundamental theorem of calculus

[tex]\left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\|=1[/tex]
Not sure how you determined this from the fundamental theorem.

[tex]x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 = 1.[/tex] This applies to a unit circle.


Why t in this equation?
[tex]\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| d\tau = t.[/tex]

The integral should provide length, not time.
 
Astronuc said:
Not sure how you determined this from the fundamental theorem.

[tex]x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 = 1.[/tex] This applies to a unit circle.

Oops. I meant

[tex]x'(t)^2 + y'(t)^2 = 1.[/tex]

As to how I got there:
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| d\tau = \frac{dt}{dt}[/tex]

[tex]\left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| = 1[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{x'(t)^2 + y'(t)^2} = 1[/tex]

[tex]x'(t)^2 + y'(t)^2 = 1.[/tex]

Astronuc said:
Why t in this equation?
[tex]\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| d\tau = t.[/tex]

I'm basically trying to find some vector-valued function r(t) in [tex]\texttt{r}^2[/tex] such that [tex]\forall t, s(t) = t[/tex], where [tex]s(t)[/tex] is arclength.
 
foxjwill said:
Oops. I meant

[tex]x'(t)^2 + y'(t)^2 = 1.[/tex]

That's better. You can play around with this by integrating with respect to t. However, you have two unknowns and one equation. I suspect that, without some additional assumptions, you won't be able to determine x(t) and y(t).

As to how I got there:
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{dt}\right\| d\tau = \frac{dt}{dt}[/tex]

Err, why would you do that? Since the integrator is [itex]d\tau[/itex], you can take |dr/dt| out because it doesn't involve [itex]\tau[/itex].
 
foxjwill said:
I'm basically trying to find some vector-valued function r(t) in [tex]\texttt{r}^2[/tex] such that [tex]\forall t, s(t) = t[/tex], where [tex]s(t)[/tex] is arclength.

This makes no sense to me. Where did s(t) come from? How are you going from a vector-valued function r(t) to a scalar-valued function s(t)?
 
e(ho0n3 said:
Err, why would you do that? Since the integrator is [itex]d\tau[/itex], you can take |dr/dt| out because it doesn't involve [itex]\tau[/itex].

Again, a mistake. >_<
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{d\tau}\right\| d\tau = \frac{dt}{dt}[/tex]


e(ho0n3 said:
This makes no sense to me. Where did s(t) come from? How are you going from a vector-valued function r(t) to a scalar-valued function s(t)?

[tex]s(t) := \int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{d\tau}\right\| d\tau[/tex]
 
foxjwill said:
Again, a mistake. >_<
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\int_0^t \left\|\frac{dr}{d\tau}\right\| d\tau = \frac{dt}{dt}[/tex]

I will assume that the derivative inside the integral is [itex]d/d\tau r(\tau)[/itex] for otherwise the integral would evaluate to 0.

The integral pretty ugly. Taking the derivative of the integral with respect to t doesn't help.
 
Yes, it does. By the fundamental theorem, mentioned before,
[tex]\left|\left|\frac{dr}{dt}\right|\right|= 1[tex] just as he said before. That gives, just as he said before, <br /> [tex]\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)= 1[/itex].<br /> <br /> In fact, that trajectory <b>is</b> the unit circle.[/tex][/tex][/tex]
 
If you bring the d/dt inside the integral and evaluate the inside of the integral before integrating, then since the integrand is with respect to tau, the derivative with respect to t will be 0.

Am I missing something?
 
e(ho0n3 said:
If you bring the d/dt inside the integral and evaluate the inside of the integral before integrating, then since the integrand is with respect to tau, the derivative with respect to t will be 0.

Am I missing something?

Yes, the fundamental theorem of calculus which says

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}\int_a^x f(t) dt = f(x)[/tex]

where a is some constant.



[tex]\int_a^x f(t) dt[/tex] is a function of x. In other words, you can't bring the [tex]\frac{d}{dx}[/tex] inside the integral because that would be like saying [tex]\frac{d}{dx}\left [x^2\right] = \left[\frac{d}{dx}(x)\right]^2,[/tex] which is obviously untrue.
 
Right. So it does simplify to [itex]x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 = 1[/itex]. Thus, x(t) = cos t and y(t) = sin t is a possible solution right?