Are Adiabatic Invariants Violated for 10 keV Electrons During a Substorm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raptor112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Adiabatic
Raptor112
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the following disturbances. Clearly state for 10 keV electrons if any of the three adiabatic invariants violated, and justify your answer?
(i) The magnetic field at L = 6.5 (~geo-stationary orbit) steadily changes strength and direction from one state to another in a time of less than 40 minutes during a substorm.
Hint: the condition for non-violation is that ##\tau_{ disturbance} / \tau_{ invariant} >>1 ##
It is useful to quantify “>>” : for this problem sheet please express the condition as
##\tau_{ disturbance} / \tau_{ invariant} >>10 ##

Homework Equations


Bounce Period ## = L R_{E} (\frac{W}{M})^{-0.5}(3.7 -1.6 sin(\alpha_{eq}))##
Drift Period ## = \frac{{2}q B_E R_E ^2}{3LW}\frac{1}{0.7+0.3sin\alpha_{eq}}##
Gyro Period ## = \frac{qB}{m}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure what value of ##\alpha_{eq}## to use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the two extremes for the periods of interest (ie when the sin term is +1 or -1)?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top