Are All Zeros of a Polynomial Ring in Z(subscript 6) Factors of 6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benzoate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Ring
Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that x^2 +3*x+2 has four zeros in Z(subscript 6),


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



x^2+3*x+2=(x+1)(x+2)=0=>x=2, and x=1

6*1=6
3*2=6

according to the back of my textbook , the other two zeroes for x^2+3*x+2 are x=4 and x=5. is it because x=4 and x=5 are nonfactors of 6?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The roots of (x+1)(x+2) over the reals are x=(-1) and x=(-2), which are congruent to 4 and 5 mod 6. So the real question is why x=1 and x=2? The problem is that Z(6) has zero divisors, e.g. 2*3=0. So you can't conclude from (x+1)(x+2)=0 that (x+1)=0 or (x+2)=0.
 
Dick said:
The roots of (x+1)(x+2) over the reals are x=(-1) and x=(-2), which are congruent to 4 and 5 mod 6. So the real question is why x=1 and x=2? The problem is that Z(6) has zero divisors, e.g. 2*3=0. So you can't conclude from (x+1)(x+2)=0 that (x+1)=0 or (x+2)=0.

Sorry, I meant to right x=-2 and x=-1 . how are x=(-1) and x=(-2) congruent to 4 and 5?
 
-2 is congruent to 4 and -1 is congruent to 5, because in each case the difference is divisible by 6.
 
Dick said:
-2 is congruent to 4 and -1 is congruent to 5, because in each case the difference is divisible by 6.

I see a pattern if you take the difference between 4-(-2) and 5-(-1) the result for both factors are 6. Would you used this approach to find numbers divisble by 6 given the x values you found from x^2+3*x+2
 
That only gives you 4 and 5. It doesn't give you 1 and 2, which are also roots. Unless you know a better system, it's safest to check all possible numbers to see if they are roots.
 
Dick said:
That only gives you 4 and 5. It doesn't give you 1 and 2, which are also roots. Unless you know a better system, it's safest to check all possible numbers to see if they are roots.

I know how to find the roots for x=-1 and x=-2 you just used the system you were taught in high school for breaking up one polynomial expression to two or more polynomial expressions. I wasn't completely sure how to find the zeroes for the other two roots.
 
Factoring it is not guaranteed to find all roots for the reasons I pointed out in the first post.
 
Dick said:
Factoring it is not guaranteed to find all roots for the reasons I pointed out in the first post.

what alternative approach would I used besides factoring to find the zeroes
?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Offhand, I don't know of a system if the base isn't a prime. I would say you want to also look at zero divisors. Since 2*3=0 and 4*3=0, (x+1)(x+2)=0 could also mean x+1=2, x+2=3 (which gives you x=1) or x+1=3, x+2=4 (which gives you x=2). Since 6 is a small number, you could also just check all possibilities.
 
  • #11
Since there are only 6 members of Z_6, a "brute strength" method would be to put each number into the polynomial and see what happens!
Obviously 0^2+ 3(0)+ 2= 2, 1^2+ 3(1)+ 2= 6= 0 (mod 6), 2^2+ 3(2)+ 2= 12= 0 (mod 6), 3^2+ 3*3+ 2= 20= 2 (mod 6), 4^2+ 3(4)+ 2= 30= 0 (mod 6), 5^2+ 3(5)+ 2= 42= 0 (mod 6).
 
  • #12
Hey Halls, I think over here we call it "brute force" instead of "brute strength". :).
 
  • #13
Well, you have to have "brute strength" in order to use "brute force"! The important thing is being a brute.
 
Back
Top