Are Black Holes Really Black or Just Colorless Void?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimmySersland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
AI Thread Summary
A black hole forms when a massive object's atoms collapse under their own gravity, creating a gravitational pull strong enough to attract light. The discussion raises the question of whether black holes are truly "black" or simply colorless voids, as they do not reflect light. The size of a black hole is determined by its event horizon, which increases as it absorbs more mass. Speculative ideas about our solar system being a black hole or the nature of matter within black holes are met with skepticism, emphasizing the need for a solid understanding of black hole physics. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of black holes and the importance of grounding theories in established scientific principles.

This is my first post, How do you think I did?

  • Good job, keep expanding your content.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pretty good, but the topic is lacking.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lacking but ok for a nubie.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Meh, Work on it. (Please leave a suggestion)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kill your post and your self, (Really bad)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
JimmySersland
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
(Correct me if you think I'm wrong in anyway, I am open to new ideas.) A black hole is created when a planetary mass has its atoms completely cave in on its self. This creates a massive amount of gravity, one so massive that it even attracts photons (light). So does this mean that a black hole isn't black but completely lacking any color at all? I think so. Here's something that I think is cool to think about (your thoughts requested no matter ;) how ridicules), If a black hole begun to suck a sun into is gradational pull
A. Would the pull of the sun pull the black hole any distance?
B. The sun being sucked in, collapsing the atoms(?), would increase the size of the hole(?)
C. What if we, our own solar system, is a black hole and our own physics are much different then the outside of our "realm".
D. Referring to C. Would that mean that the matter in a black hole could also be 99.99% free space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You specify a "planetary mass" forming a black hole. You may check the Wikipedia entry at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

to find the common classification of black holes according to their mass.

“Black holes are commonly classified according to their mass, independent of angular momentum J or electric charge Q. The size of a black hole, as determined by the radius of the event horizon, or Schwarzschild radius, is roughly proportional to the mass..."

Several other questions you asked about are also addressed in the Wiki entry.

A. Gravitational attraction between two masses follows a simple relationship, always the same whether masses of black holes or any other kind of mass.

B. A black hole's size is measured by it's "event horizon". Adding mass increases it.

C. "What if we, our own solar system, is a black hole"? is a question that does not make any sense. Can you revise or rephrase it while keeping real black hole physics in mind?

D. Same as above.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to PF;
JimmySersland said:
(Correct me if you think I'm wrong in anyway, I am open to new ideas.) A black hole is created when a planetary mass has its atoms completely cave in on its self.
No - it takes much more than a planetary mass.

This creates a massive amount of gravity, one so massive that it even attracts photons (light).
No - the gravity is exactly the same as when the matter was not collapsed.
It's just that the volume is very small, and gravity increases as you get closer to the surface.

So does this mean that a black hole isn't black but completely lacking any color at all?
The concept of color is tricky to apply to such objects. What you usually think of as the color of a surface is due to the light scattering from the surface interacting with your visual system. Since light does not escape the event horizon, then there is no color from there.

I think so.
Advancing personal theories is frowned upon here. Do you have any references to back up your thinking?

Here's something that I think is cool to think about (your thoughts requested no matter ;) how ridicules), If a black hole begun to suck a sun into is gradational pull
A. Would the pull of the sun pull the black hole any distance?
Gravity is a long-range force.
When you say Sun" think "star".

B. The sun being sucked in, collapsing the atoms(?), would increase the size of the hole(?)
The event horizon of the black hole would increase.

C. What if we, our own solar system, is a black hole and our own physics are much different then the outside of our "realm".
Then the "solar system" includes stars and galaxies and... well... the Rest Of The Universe. So it is the same as asking about "what if the physics outside the Universe is different".

1. Baseless speculation is frowned upon here.
2. It doesn't matter - we can only know about this Universe.
3. The possibility that our Universe is inside a black hole has been explored.

D. Referring to C. Would that mean that the matter in a black hole could also be 99.99% free space?
That is a meaningless question.

I think you need to study more about black holes.
Starting from the quickie basics:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/b...0/ten-things-you-dont-know-about-black-holes/

... to the more advanced geometry:
http://www.jimhaldenwang.com/black_hole.htm

... you'll probably want the stuff in between ;)
What you don't want to do is draw conclusions from pop-science TV shows.
CHeers.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top