I Are Black Holes Truly 3D Phenomena?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the three-dimensional nature of black holes, challenging the common two-dimensional whirlpool analogy. Participants argue that the event horizon is inherently three-dimensional and that gravity operates uniformly in all directions from a central point, similar to Earth's gravitational pull. It is clarified that black holes do not "suck" objects in but exert gravitational forces like any massive body, such as the Sun, until one approaches closely. The conversation also suggests that black holes can be viewed as stable systems rather than constantly consuming matter. Overall, the nature of black holes is complex and requires a nuanced understanding of gravitational dynamics.
Bujon
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
So having considered the classical depiction of a black hole resembling a whirlpool, my thought process is that a black hole must be a 3-d phenomenon. Therefore I can not see how a event horizon/swirlpool model could be plausible unless the centre of a black hole was spinning and literally was only attracting matter on a 2-d plane. Is it possible a black is more like a bubble in the bath water, an empty vacuum which doesn't actually have an even horizon as such, perhaps magnetic in nature in the 3-d. Be interested to hear your thoughts.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The event horizon of a black hole is 3d, not 2d. The 2d whirlpool depiction is completely inaccurate. It is not magnetic in nature, but gravitational.
 
  • Like
Likes Bujon
Can gravity pull from a centre point equally 3dimensionally? And is that just down to the mass? If that was the case then whatever your approach to a black hole would mean you were going to be sucked toward it, and the event horizon would be your point of no return, which I can grasp. Just not sure how something could orbit a black hole without seeing stuff from above and below and beyond that black hole on every point on the x and y and z axis being sucked in.
 
Last edited:
Bujon said:
Can gravity pull from a centre point equally 3dimensionally?

Of course! That's exactly how it works. Take for example the Earth. Every single point-like portion of the Earth exerts a gravitational force on all objects in all directions, with the force being inversely proportional to r2, where r is the distance between the object and that portion of the Earth. The total gravitational force exerted by the Earth on an object is just the sum of the force exerted by all of these portions.

Bujon said:
If that was the case then whatever your approach to a black hole would mean you were going to be sucked toward it

Contrary to what you've heard or read, black holes do not "suck in objects". Gravity from a black hole works just like the gravity from the Sun. The planets are not being sucked into the Sun, are they? Gravity from a 1-solar mass black hole would be identical to gravity from the Sun until you were closer than one solar radii to the black hole, at which point the gravitational force is simply larger than that of the Sun, increasing further as you get closer to the black hole. Objects still do not get sucked in.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2, Hoophy and Bujon
Ok well explained, so a black hole in that case represents a stable system. They are not necessarily 'growing' eating up everything in sight, but more have finished the main course and are now sat bulging on the sofa so to speak.
 
You could think of it that way, sure.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top