Are Christoffel Symbols Considered Tensors?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Karl G.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symbols Tensors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of Christoffel symbols in the context of tensor mathematics, particularly whether they can be considered tensors based on their transformation properties. The scope includes theoretical aspects of general relativity and tensor calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Christoffel symbols are not tensors because they do not obey the standard component transformation law.
  • One participant notes that Christoffel symbols are necessary for making the covariant derivative a tensor.
  • Another participant mentions that many texts on general relativity clarify that Christoffel symbols are not tensors.
  • A participant points out that while Christoffel symbols transform inhomogeneously under general coordinate transformations, they do transform as tensors under linear coordinate transformations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on whether Christoffel symbols should be classified as tensors, with multiple competing views presented regarding their transformation properties.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the specific transformation laws and the implications of linear versus non-linear coordinate transformations on the classification of Christoffel symbols.

Karl G.
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I'm sort of confused about Christofel symbols being called tensors. I thought that to be considered a tensor, the tensor had to obey the standard component transformation law. For example: Ga'b' = Lca'Ldb'Gcd
But the Christofel symbols don't obey this transformation law; their components transform in a different way (I would like to show it, but I don't know how; see exercise 10.3 of MWT).
What gives?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, Christoffel symbols are not tensors.
 
Oh ... thought they were
 
Christoffel symbols make the covariant derivative a tensor. Try transforming one.
 
I haven't seen a single book on GR which introduces the Christoffel symbols without immediately pointing out that they're not tensors.
 
Karl G. said:
I'm sort of confused about Christofel symbols being called tensors. I thought that to be considered a tensor, the tensor had to obey the standard component transformation law. For example: Ga'b' = Lca'Ldb'Gcd
But the Christofel symbols don't obey this transformation law; their components transform in a different way (I would like to show it, but I don't know how; see exercise 10.3 of MWT).
What gives?

They transform inhomogeneously under general coordinates transformations, i.e., not tensors. However, the inhomogeneous term in the transformation law vanishes if the coordinate transformations are LINEAR. So, they do transform as tensors with respect to all linear coordinate transformations.

sam
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K