Are Coefficients of Friction Independent of Weight?

AI Thread Summary
Coefficients of friction, both static (µs) and kinetic (µk), are generally considered independent of the weight being pulled, according to standard examination questions and theoretical discussions. In practical applications, while the coefficients can vary due to factors like surface conditions and pressure, they typically remain consistent across different weights under low pressure conditions. Experimental evidence suggests that reducing the weight does not significantly alter the coefficients of friction, as friction is directly proportional to weight to a certain extent. However, it is recommended to conduct experiments to verify these principles. Overall, the consensus is that µs and µk remain relatively constant regardless of the weight applied.
mybrohshi5
Messages
365
Reaction score
0
Are coefficients of friction Ms and Mk independent of the weight being pulled?

We just had a lab on friction and i am just curious about this.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mybrohshi5! :smile:

(have a mu: µ :wink:)

In examination questions, µs and µk are always independent of weight. :wink:

In reality, see this, from the PF Library on friction:

Tables of coefficients of friction:

Many tables can be found on a http://www.google.com/search?client...ficients+of+friction+table&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8", which begins
"Extreme care is needed in using friction coefficients, and additional independent references should be used. For any specific application the ideal method of determining the coefficient of friction is by trials. A short table is included above the main table to illustrate how the coefficient of friction is affected by surface films. When a metal surface is perfectly clean in a vacuum, the friction is much higher than the normal accepted value and seizure can easily occur."
​
For some materials, the coefficient can be greater than one, and for solids on rubber it can be as high as four.

Increasing pressure between dry surfaces may increase the coefficient, at first slightly, but eventually very quickly, leading to seizing. For this and other factors affecting coefficients of friction, see the top box in http://www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Tribology/co_of_frict.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks tiny-tim.

In my lab we used about a 1 kg weight on top of a wooden block and that was dragged across the table.

So say i reduced that weight down to 0.5 kg and dragged it again would the coefficients of friction be the same or different?

From what i got from the websites you posted i think the coefficients of friction will be independent of the weight therefore making them stay the same because...

...since relatively low pressures are being used then the friction would go down as the weight goes down and the friction would go up as the weight goes up (to an extent) so basically i am saying that the friction is directly proportional to the weight so µk and µs will stay the same making them independent of the weight being pulled...
 
Hi mybrohshi5! :smile:

Should be the same, for exactly the reasons you've given.

(But you should still try it! :wink:)
 
Thank you. That helped clear up a lot of things for me :)
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

B Coefficient of friction in sea water
Replies
26
Views
2K
I Question about friction in situation where interface slip occurs
Replies
4
Views
1K
I If frictional force in system is <= us*N then there is no slipping
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Torque required from powered roller to rotate cylinder
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Coefficient of rolling friction for a lab cart
Replies
8
Views
5K
Why is rolling easier than sliding?
2
Replies
71
Views
10K
B Static friction needed for rolling without slipping
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Friction Coefficient of Marble & Iron on Plastic
Replies
1
Views
2K
Measuring the coefficient of friction
Replies
1
Views
1K
Does Coefficient of Friction Change with Rougher Surfaces?
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top