Are electrically neutral particles invisible?

pelmel92
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
As the thread title suggests, I was wondering if electrically neutral particles like neutrons can absorb/emit/reflect photons. I don't really have any sort of physics background so I'm not sure this question even makes much sense... but I vaguely remember hearing that photons don't necessarily interact with all particles, which got me to wondering about which particles they do/don't affect. Since photons are, as I understand it, electromagnetic in nature, it made sense to me that maybe they wouldn't be able to interact with electrically neutral particles... which I imagine would render them invisible.

Anyone willing to alleviate my breathtaking ignorance would be greatly appreciated :)

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As wikipedia suggests here a neutron does not have NET electric charge. But it consists of up and down quarks which have electric charge (+2e/3 for the up quark, -1e/3 for the down quark, e the charge of electron) so most likely interracts with photons . (Common matter has no net electric charge too but still interacts with photons ).
 
Neutrons also have a magnetic-dipole moment, this also due to their quark content. However, it interacts much more weakly than an electric charge. I estimate for the photon scattering cross section:

CS(M1) ~ (w/m)2 CS(E0)
M1 = magnetic dipole
E0 = electric charge

CS(E0) = Thomson scattering (scattering off of free charged particles)
CS(E0, neutron) = (melectron/mneutron)2 CS(E0, electron)

w = angular frequency of photon, m = mass of neutron

CS(M1)/CS(E0,electron) is about 10-24 for visible light.

Neutrons' electric-dipole moments are too small to measure. Experimental limits are about 10-13 e*fermi (neutron size), while the Standard Model predicts a value 10-6 times smaller than that. A neutron's electric-dipole moment would have to be about 1 e*fermi to produce an amount of scattering comparable to what a neutron's magnetic-dipole moment produces.

But there's another electrical property we can use: polarizability. That's even worse:

CS(pol) ~ (w/m)4 CS(E0)

So CS(pol)/CS(E0,electron) ~ 10-42 for visible light.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top