Are electrons constantly orbiting around the nucleus in an atom?

  • Thread starter Thread starter davon806
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
AI Thread Summary
Electrons in an atom do not orbit the nucleus in the traditional sense, as the nucleus exerts a force perpendicular to their displacement, meaning it does not do work on them. Instead, electrons possess intrinsic kinetic energy, which allows them to move independently of the nucleus's energy. In a closed circuit, the battery provides energy that pushes electrons through the circuit, and this energy is eventually depleted. The discussion also highlights that electrons gain kinetic energy when they are drawn closer to the nucleus, losing potential energy in the process. Overall, the movement of electrons is a result of their own kinetic energy rather than a continuous energy supply from the nucleus.
davon806
Messages
147
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi,I am currently studying A-level physics in the UK.:smile:
I have been taught that electrons in an atom are orbiting around the nucleus.
I would like to ask a question:

Consider 2 situations:
(1):
A man is pushing a box forwards along a horizontal road.
Work done = Fs
The chemical energy of the man is converted into the kinetic energy of the box.
(2):
In a closed circuit,chemical energy of the battery is converted to the kinetic energy of
electrons.

That means energy is related to force.Without energy,no force can be exerted on an object.
In my case,if electrons are constantly moving around the nucleus,does it mean that the
nucleus is exerting a force on the electron,so that the electrons have enough energy to
move at any time instant?

If that's true,consider (2) again,the chemical energy in batteries will eventually run out,so that
there will be no more energy supplied to the circuit.
Back to my original concern,once the nucleus has used up its energy,will the electron stop
moving,and stick on the surface of the nucleus?

Thx so much :s

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll stick to the Bohr's model of the atom here as it makes sense easily. Now if a force is applied on a body, it is not necessary that work is done on it or energy is supplied. Work is defined as F.s or as Fscosθ where θ is the angle between the force and displacement vectors. So if the force is perpendicular to the movement of the object, no work is done on it.

The nucleus of an atom does no work on the electron as it exerts a force perpendicular to the electron's displacement. The electrons are moving because they have energy of their own (kinetic energy).

In case of the electric circuit, the electric field produced by the battery pushes the electrons. Here the battery does work because the force and displacement are parallel. And here the battery also gets exhausted as it uses up its chemical energy to produce a field and push the electrons.
 
Sunil Simha said:
I'll stick to the Bohr's model of the atom here as it makes sense easily. Now if a force is applied on a body, it is not necessary that work is done on it or energy is supplied. Work is defined as F.s or as Fscosθ where θ is the angle between the force and displacement vectors. So if the force is perpendicular to the movement of the object, no work is done on it.

The nucleus of an atom does no work on the electron as it exerts a force perpendicular to the electron's displacement. The electrons are moving because they have energy of their own (kinetic energy).

In case of the electric circuit, the electric field produced by the battery pushes the electrons. Here the battery does work because the force and displacement are parallel. And here the battery also gets exhausted as it uses up its chemical energy to produce a field and push the electrons.

Then where does the energy of electron come from?Something must have exerted a force on it so that it can move,do you mean it has kinetic energy intrinsically?
 
davon806 said:
Then where does the energy of electron come from?Something must have exerted a force on it so that it can move,do you mean it has kinetic energy intrinsically?

I guess the electron acquires its kinetic energy when it gets captured by the nucleus. Initially, say the electron was very far away ( you can say that it was in an orbit around the nucleus at infinite distance). Because of the attraction of the nucleus, it was brought into smaller and smaller orbits up to its current position. Here, you can see that the electron lost electrical potential energy and (by energy conservation) gained kinetic energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top