Are Fermat's Little Theorem and Wilson's Theorems Useful in Number Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matqkks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
matqkks
Messages
280
Reaction score
5
What use are Fermat’s Little Theorem and Wilson’s theorems in number theory? Do these theorems have any real life applications? We cannot use them to find primes as both are pretty inefficient for large numbers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First, they show that it is possible to answer some of these questions - this was historically important, as our knowledge is based upon the cumulative results of the past.

Second, these are easier to understand than many more recent results, and are useful when you are learning how to attack these problems. For homework-type problems they work quite well.

This is a partial answer to your first question ... as to useful applications today, it depends upon the application! If you always work with very large numbers, then they would not be the most efficient technique. But it depends upon your application.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

2
Replies
78
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
72
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top