Are FFAGs Being Overlooked in Proton Therapy Technology?

physnerdonpiano
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm new at Physics Forum.

I'm looking at the different accelerator technologies being used in proton therapy across the world. One of the more recent technologies I have come across is FFAG (fixed field, alternating gradient). It seems to have a lot of advantages over synchrotrons and cyclotrons.

FFAG exists for several decades, and I would think that the technology would be more or less mature by now. So my question is, why is it not as prevalent as, say, cyclotrons and synchrotrons in the realm of proton therapy machines?

If you guys have any references on the topic, I will be really, really, really (x1000) grateful.

Thanks!

physnerdonpiano
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top