Are Fock States Eigenstates for the Operators a^{\dagger} and a?

Ylle
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have to show that the Fock states are eigenstates for the operators {{\hat{a}}^{\dagger }} and/or {\hat{a}}

And I'm not totally sure how to show this.


Homework Equations



?


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that if I use the operators on a random Fock state i get:

a^{\dagger}|n\rangle=\sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle
a|n\rangle=\sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle

So what's next ?


Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you are typing the question correctly? Because as you just showed, Fock states are not eigenstates of the creation and annihilation operators. Maybe you are getting it confused with coherent states.
 
Ahhh...
It said: IS the Fock states eigenstates for the operators, doh...

So when I use the operators on the Fock state, they are not eigenstates because of the |n-1> and |n+1> at the end, which should have been just |n> in each case, or am I way off ?
 
Yes, an eigenstate of an operator won't change under an operation on the operator. So you would just get back |n> with a coefficient called the eigenvalue.
 
Well, thank you :)
Didn't know it was that easy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top