Are Generalized Pell Numbers Already Known and What are Their Properties?

T.Rex
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi,
In the following document: Generalized Pell Numbers, I've defined what I call "Generalized Pell Numbers".
They provide a way for computing: 1+\sqrt[m]{m}.

I'd like to know if these numbers are already known or not, and if someone knows about other properties they have or if someone is interested to look after new properties.

My main goal is to get more information about the period of Pell Numbers modulo a prime number. So my hope is that these Generalized Pell Numbers will lead to something that could help me.

If you know about properties of Pell numbers modulo a prime number, just let me know !

Tony
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More interesting info: primality test for Fermat numbers ?

Hi,

I've added more information in the paper. A preliminary study seems to show that all these numbers share interesting properties modulo a prime number (including a Fermat prime number) that could lead to a primality test, once proofs are provided ...

Tony
 


Hello Tony,

Thank you for sharing your work on Generalized Pell Numbers. To answer your question, yes, these numbers have been studied before and have been found to have interesting properties. In fact, they are a generalization of Pell numbers, which have been studied extensively in number theory.

Some other properties of Generalized Pell Numbers include their relationship to Lucas sequences and their connection to the golden ratio. They also have applications in algebraic number theory and have been studied for their divisibility properties.

As for your main goal, there is ongoing research on the period of Pell Numbers modulo a prime number. Your work on Generalized Pell Numbers may indeed contribute to this area of study and could potentially lead to new insights. I would recommend reaching out to other researchers or joining a number theory community to discuss your findings and potentially collaborate on further investigations.

I wish you all the best in your research and hope you continue to explore the fascinating world of Generalized Pell Numbers.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top