Are genetic sequences the only way to determine species relations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jekertee
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Determining the relationship between two species primarily involves analyzing genetic sequence similarities, a method known as cladistics. However, other factors also play a significant role in establishing these relationships. The similarity of reproductive organs, such as flowers and ovaries in plants and animals, is a key indicator. Additionally, specific phenotypic traits, like mammalian teeth structure or pelvis formation, are used, especially in the study of fossils. While genetic analysis is the most reliable method, it is supplemented by morphological comparisons when genetic data is unavailable. The discussion highlights the complexity of species classification, particularly when multiple species exhibit similar genetic characteristics.
Jekertee
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
A very simple question I am struggling about, I don't know how to determine two species are related. Is it only the similarity in the genetic sequences ?

Thanks
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I think I should ask ALL of my questions so that I won't keep asking

that,

Is there also a strange problem as when 3 or 4 species having the same degree of similarity in their compared sequences ? (please don't laugh at my question :-( )
 
For plants and animals it usually is:
1. similarity of reproductive organs (flowers, ovaries, etc..)
2. similarity of DNA sequences of course - this is called cladistics
3. Specific conservative phenotypic values (visible traits) - like mammalian teeth or the structure of the pelvis. This is used with non-living species - fossils.

#2 is the gold standard, but until we have that for every existing species we go with number 1, and secondarily things like #3.
 
Last edited:
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top