Are Kuhn Lengths Determined by the Number of Bonds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chemie
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Kuhn lengths are not fixed but depend on the number of bonds in a polymer chain. The discussion references a text that suggests specific values for the number of bonds in polyethylene and poly(cis-isoprene) to calculate Kuhn lengths. The formula for Kuhn lengths indicates that they vary based on the chosen number of bonds. This leads to confusion about whether Kuhn lengths can be considered fixed. Ultimately, the conclusion is that while specific values may be used, Kuhn lengths are inherently variable based on the number of bonds.
chemie
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Okay so I know that they aren't but this thing i am reading makes it appear that they are fixed.
QUOTE from the text:

"The values of nb(for the statistical segment) chosen in this work are 18 bonds for
polyethylene and 24 bonds (a hexamer) for poly(cisisoprene).
One reason for these choices of nb involves the concept of the Kuhn statistical length, which, for polyethylene is ,12A°and ,9 A° for poly(cis-isoprene)".

So is he trying to say that Kuhn lenghts are fixed?

I don't understand. because kuhn lenghts follow this formula: ,h=nL and <h^2>=nL^2 ...which means it depends on the number of bonds 'n' that we chose to work with in the first place.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
well i was wrong they are indeed fixed.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...

Similar threads

Back
Top