Are Liberal Arts Colleges a Good Choice for Undergraduate Physics Programs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter proclef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apply Undergrad
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a high school senior finalizing their college list with aspirations for a PhD in physics. The student has identified several colleges of strong interest, including Rice, Harvey Mudd, Reed, and Carleton, and expresses concerns about the availability of advanced physics courses at liberal arts colleges (LACs) due to potential faculty and student interest issues. They seek insights on how LACs are perceived by graduate schools compared to larger research universities like UT-Austin and Cornell. Additionally, the student contemplates whether applying to prestigious institutions like Caltech or MIT is worthwhile, given their strong academic credentials, including a 35 ACT score, 800 SAT Math 2, and a 3.8 unweighted GPA. The consensus suggests that applying to Caltech or MIT could be beneficial, as these schools offer significant opportunities for future academic and career paths.
proclef
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, this fall I'll be a senior in high school and with the Common Application nearly out, I need to finish my final college list. The reason I'm posting on this forum is because my goal is to ultimately attend grad school for a PhD in physics. This is my current list that I've come up with after doing a good amount of searching:

Strong interest
-Rice
-Harvey Mudd
-Reed
-Carleton

Decent interest
-Cornell
-Williams
-UT - Austin

My 2 backups are cheap state schools.

When I was looking through schools, I mainly looked at the physics faculty, courses offered, and PhD production rates. This turned up a lot of LACs like Williams, Carleton, Reed, HMC. However I have heard that LACs tend to not offer some higher-level classes (and even some important ones like Thermo) some years due to lack of student interest/lack of faculty. Would this be a problem at the LACs on my list? Everything else about them seems so great, though: smaller class sizes, great faculty, no grad students taking up research opportunities. How are these schools looked upon by grad schools in comparison to larger research universities like UT - Austin and Cornell?

Also, is it worth it to apply to Caltech/MIT for undergrad physics and would they suit me better than the schools on my list?

My transcript is decent (35 ACT 36 Math, 800 SAT Math 2 + Chemistry, 3.8 UW GPA) so feel free to suggest other schools.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might as well apply to Caltech or MIT, those are fantastic scores you have (unless you had low scores in other subjects not listed) and with a degree from either school you open up a lot of opportunities elsewhere (whether it's grad school like you said or a career).
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top