Are logarithms only non-negative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mileena
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
mileena
Messages
129
Reaction score
0
I read that logb x exists only when x >= 0

what about log-3 -27 though?

The answer should be the exponent 3, right?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can define the logarithm for all nonzero real numbers. But this requires complex number theory. So it's not suitable for high school.
 
micromass said:
You can define the logarithm for all nonzero real numbers. But this requires complex number theory. So it's not suitable for high school.

Thanks, I read the above though in the book Pre-Calculus for Dummies. It said all logarithms and bases were non-negative. I'm not that good on trigonometry or pre-calc.
 
mileena said:
Thanks, I read the above though in the book Pre-Calculus for Dummies. It said all logarithms and bases were non-negative. I'm not that good on trigonometry or pre-calc.

Yeah. So for now just take it as given that the bases are nonnegative. You might see the more general theory later.
 
Thank you. I will take your advice. Any less work for me is a good thing!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
13K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top