Are lunar landings without chemical rockets possible?

AI Thread Summary
Landing on the moon without chemical rockets is highly challenging due to the high speeds involved, with horizontal and vertical velocities reaching approximately 1.2 km/s and 400 m/s, respectively. The use of airbags to cushion the landing would result in extreme accelerations that are impractical and potentially destructive, as the forces involved would exceed survivable limits for any landing device. The abrasive lunar surface further complicates the feasibility of using airbags, as current materials may not withstand the impact. While ion engines have been suggested as a potential alternative for future landings, their current capabilities are insufficient for safe lunar landings. Overall, achieving a functional lunar landing without chemical rockets remains a significant engineering challenge.
guss
Messages
246
Reaction score
0
If a satellite tries to land on the moon without rockets to counter the force of gravity, it comes in too fast and crashes into the surface destroying itself. A satellite would be orbiting at approximately 1.8 km/s or so at a 50km altitude, and come in for landing from that height which would speed it up an additional .4 km/s. All in all we are probably talking 1.2km/s in the horizontal direction and 400 m/s in the vertical direction upon touchdown. It would I was thinking there may be some type of airbag that could deploy, and allow it to roll on the surface which would slow it down in the vertical direction. Maybe have it land on a downward slope for a bit of a softer landing?

Just something interesting I was thinking of. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It might help if you thought of the problem from a practical standpoint. You're talking about trying to bring something from 4300 km/hr in the horizontal, and 1400 km/hr in the vertical, to a stop. There's just no way to do that with an airbag and keep the accelerations reasonable.

Taking into account just the vertical speed, if we assume your airbag is 10m thick (that sounds like a pretty big airbag), you're talking an acceleration of -8,000 m/s^2 (-816g), not even including the 182 rpm spin rate that would be induced from impacting the surface at 4300 km/s. Your airbag would also have to be made out of material that is tough enough to handle hitting the very abrasive lunar surface (basically ground silica glass) at that speed, probably not possible with any existing technology.
 
The answer to this question relies heavily on how you define a landing. In general terms a lunar landing without a chemical rocket is very easy to do as long as you are aimed at the surface and you hit said surface. If you require the landing device/object to be usable afterwards then this conversation changes completely ;)
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits
Yes landing... in one piece.. and functional.
 
No atmosphere to dissipate any energy like on Mars.
 
There was a swedish rocket that used ion engines. Terribly weak engines they said. but in the future perhaps those would be able to counter the gravity enough to make a landing.
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Back
Top