Are Pop III Stars Finally Detected in I Zw 18?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
AI Thread Summary
The paper "Population III Stars in I Zw 18" presents potential evidence for the detection of Population III stars, characterized by their very low metallicity, primarily consisting of hydrogen and helium. The authors observed extremely hot stars emitting recombination UV from doubly ionized helium, indicating their youth and lack of metal production. Notably, these stars exhibited no stellar wind, suggesting they formed in an environment devoid of heavier elements. I Zw 18, an active star-forming galaxy, offers a unique opportunity for further investigation of these early-type stars, which are analogous to the first stars in the universe. The findings could significantly enhance our understanding of stellar evolution and the conditions of the early universe.
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
751
This paper; http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02742, Population III Stars in I Zw 18, claims potentially conclusive evidence of detection of pop III stars.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thanks for sharing, Chronos! I'm looking forward to hearing more about this.
 
That's interesting. These are, perhaps, the first stars formed.
They are distinguished by very low "metal" (absence of elements heavier than H and He)

The authors found stars so hot that their light contained the recombination UV from doubly ionized Helium.
Takes very high temperature to get both electrons off a helium atom.

And apparently these very hot bright massive stars did not show evidence of WIND.
Stellar wind is caused by radiation pressure of star's light on heavier elements ("metals") like Oxygen and Carbon.

So these stars were so young that they had not made metals, and they were so early that the galaxy they formed in did not have metals made by earlier stars. These were pristine first-type stars. So-called PopIII

The windlessness seems to have been the clincher---the fact that here were these extremely hot intense stars whose ATMOSPHERES apparently contained only H and He.

Really interesting paper! Thanks for sharing.
 
Last edited:
marcus said:
That's interesting. These are, perhaps, the first stars formed.
They are distinguished by very low "metal" (absence of elements heavier than H and He)

The same kind of stars that were the first stars formed, surely. My understanding of Zw 18 is that it's still a very active star forming galaxy, and in any case, the first pop III stars will be long gone, even in a galaxy 18 Mpc away.

But hey, a good analogy is fantastic.
 
Good point 18 x 3.26 is only 59 million LY. This is relatively near, these stars are practically our contemporaries . But they are the same TYPE as the first stars----analogous to them as you say.
 
marcus said:
Good point 18 x 3.26 is only 59 million LY. This is relatively near, these stars are practically our contemporaries . But they are the same TYPE as the first stars----analogous to them as you say.

Right! And being basically on our doorstep, they are good candidates for investigation too!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top