Are proofs from calc class needed for EE?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sk2017
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class Ee Proofs
AI Thread Summary
Understanding the derivation of mathematical formulas can be challenging for first-year calculus students, particularly in engineering disciplines. Many students find themselves able to apply formulas in problem-solving but struggle with the underlying concepts and derivations presented in textbooks. It's emphasized that while using formulas is essential for engineering jobs, developing the skill to derive equations is equally valuable. This ability enhances problem-solving skills and fosters a deeper understanding of the material. Engaging in study groups and seeking help from peers can facilitate learning. Over time, students often find that their understanding of derivations improves as they encounter related concepts in advanced courses. Persistence and practice are key, as many students experience similar struggles during their academic journey.
sk2017
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am a first year calculus two student. I found that I have serious trouble understanding the derivation of formulas. For example, I can solve most of the exam problems because they are just using formulas, say arc length = Integral(sqrt( 1+ (dy/dx)^2)dx, but my textbook actually has two pages dedicated to how this formula is derived. I've looked at youtube videos and "kind of" understands it, but certainly not to the degree my textbook explains. I found it extremely troubling when doing center of mass problems, because the textbook dedicated 4 pages of work to reach the final formula, and I can't even find one place online that says anything else than "here's the formula and just use it."

so basically, I can just do algebra provided with a formula (i'm not even good at algebra...), except with integral signs and derivatives. Is one suppose to understand this math stuff for an EE job or is using formulas all that's required?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Wow, don't give up. I remember when I was a senior in engineering school. I recall thinking that learning how to derive my own equations to fit the problem was by far the most valuable skill I learned in all my years of school. Facts you can look up in books. Even specific concepts and understanding of physics may or may not be useful on your job. But two things are certainly useful for engineers, 1) doing your own derivations, and 2) a feel for numbers so that you can guess the approximate answer without calculating. Slide rules in my day, helped a lot with #2.

But learning how to derive equations is not the subject of any course I had. Just seeing it done in class and then doing homework problems is what makes the light bulb light eventually.

Do you participate in study groups? Sometimes students learn best from each other.

I repeat, don't give up.
 
  • Like
Likes sk2017 and cnh1995
As an EE, I agree with anorlunda. The ability to derive things is a useful skill for EE.

However, in my case it took years to really develop the skill. I started to work at it my sophomore year, after watching my physics TA skillfully answer any question we asked by starting from first principles and deriving the answer.

For me, whenever a subject captured my imagination (electromagnetism and probability my sophomore year) i would spend some time learning some of the derivations and practicing related derivations that often showed up as example problems in textbooks. Time limitations of course meant that I had to pick and choose when to invest time this way (you will not have time to do everything!)

I also found that I really learned to understand calculus derivations in subsequent physics and engineering classes. So you will have many more opportunities to learn this stuff. Likewise, next year you will probably learn vector calculus, and your upper division eletromagnics course will help you understand it better.

So do not fret. You are on the same track many of us were at your stage.

Jason
 
  • Like
Likes sk2017
Thanks for sharing! I feel much better
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top