Are the 3 Resistors in Parallel? Check Here!

AI Thread Summary
The three resistors discussed are confirmed to be in parallel, as the top resistor is clearly connected in parallel with the lower resistors. The definition of parallel components is highlighted, emphasizing that current can flow through either resistor. In contrast, series components require current to flow through both. The discussion suggests that the lower two resistors may be causing confusion regarding their configuration. Understanding these connections is crucial for analyzing circuit behavior effectively.
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
Are the three resistors that I circled in the paint doc in parallel??
 

Attachments

  • sdsdsdsdsd.jpg
    sdsdsdsdsd.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 378
Physics news on Phys.org
yes ...
 
It's fairly obvious that the top resistor is in parallel with whatever is going on below, right? So I suspect the bottom portion is giving you trouble.

Remember, the definition of components being in parallel means that current has the option of flowing through either component while being in series means that current must flow through both components. When the current travels through the bottom 2-resistor branch, is there more than one way to get past that part of the circuit?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Finding parallel or in-series resistors
Replies
3
Views
662
Calculating the voltage across capacitors and resistors with switches
Replies
2
Views
720
Confused about a Result (Circuit Analysis)
Replies
8
Views
1K
Why Do Capacitors Behave Differently in Series and Parallel Configurations?
Replies
20
Views
2K
Need help with a question on potential difference
Replies
7
Views
1K
Why Are Some Resistors in Parallel While Others Are Not?
Replies
1
Views
1K
How Are These Resistors in Parallel
Replies
3
Views
1K
Finding the Current Through a Resistor (Working With Parallel and Series)
Replies
3
Views
1K
How to determine if electrical components are connected in parallel or in series?
Replies
10
Views
896
Calculate the resistance to add in parallel to balance this bridge circuit
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top