Are the Forces During a Gunshot Balanced and Optimized by Barrel Length?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thetexan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between barrel length and the forces acting on a bullet during a gunshot. The recoil force experienced by the shooter is equal to the force propelling the bullet, minus energy losses during flight. While longer barrels initially allow for greater acceleration of the bullet by expanding gas, friction eventually limits this acceleration, leading to an optimal barrel length. Beyond this point, additional barrel length can cause the bullet to decelerate due to friction and pressure changes. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing firearm performance.
thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
My understanding is this...

a. The force acting to recoil the mass of the rifle and the mass of the shooter combined is equal (give or take small other masses such as gas) to the force acting to push the bullet down the barrel.

b. This means that all of that force you feel in your shoulder is the same as that acting on the tip end of that bullet as it enters the target (minus loss of energy during flight).

c. Since the the expanding gas is what is driving the bullet down the barrel you would think, at first, that the longer the barrel the more opportunity the gas has to accelerate the bullet. However, there comes a point where, when considering the friction between the bullet and the barrel, the gas no longer can accelerate the bullet and at that point the friction becomes a slowing factor. Therefore the point where this occurs determines the ideal length of the barrel...any shorter and the gas escapes before it finishes it acceleration...any longer and the friction of the barrel begins to decelerate the bullet absent the push from the gas.

Am I thinking correctly?

thanks,
tex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thetexan said:
Am I thinking correctly?

Pretty much, yes.

The details can get complicated: The force on the bullet is equal to the cross-section area of the bullet times the pressure behind it; as the bullet moves forward the volume increases and the pressure decreases; heat is transferred to the barrel which lowers the pressure; the combustion of the propellant is not instantaneous so the pressure may continue to build even after the bullet starts moving; and so forth. But you've got the basic concept down.
 
Even with a frictionless barrel, there would come a point where lengthening the barrel would slow the bullet.
The bullet is compressing the air in the barrel in front of it while the pressure in the barrel behind it decreases. Given a long enough barrel, the bullet would begin to decelerate - and perhaps even reverse direction.
 
Yes. There will be some point where all of the factors come into equilibrium and after that point we're losing ground.
 
thetexan said:
However, there comes a point where, when considering the friction between the bullet and the barrel, the gas no longer can accelerate the bullet and at that point the friction becomes a slowing factor.
Right. If you want to build a super-cannon, you need multiple charges along the way (multi-charge gun):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-3_cannon
 
Some of the force is spent imparting the spin of the bullet (rifling in the barrel).
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top