Are There Alternatives to the Higgs Mechanism for Explaining Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking?

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Are there any other mechanisms apart from Higgs mechanism that explains the spontaneous symmetry breaking making photon massless and W and Z bosons massive?
Do you really believe in the Higgs mechanism?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll believe in the Higgs mechanism when Tevatron or LHC finds the (or a) Higgs particle. While there's a paper published on the arxiv every now and then suggesting some other means of generating mass, none of them have reached acceptance in the physics community. Today just about all particle physicists explain all particle masses by the Higgs mechanism.
 


The Higgs mechanism is a widely accepted theory in particle physics that explains the origin of mass in elementary particles. It proposes the existence of a Higgs field, which permeates the entire universe, and particles interact with this field to acquire mass. This mechanism also predicts the existence of a fundamental particle, the Higgs boson, which was discovered in 2012 by the Large Hadron Collider.

While the Higgs mechanism is the most widely accepted explanation for the spontaneous symmetry breaking that results in the mass of W and Z bosons, there are other theories that attempt to explain this phenomenon. One example is the technicolor theory, which proposes that there are new fundamental particles that interact with the W and Z bosons and give them mass. However, the Higgs mechanism remains the most well-supported and experimentally verified explanation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top