Are There Examples of New Species with Minimal Changes in Appearance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex_Sanders
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of new species defined by taxonomy that exhibit minimal physical changes from their original counterparts, primarily due to reproductive isolation. Examples include organisms like mosquitoes that have diverged enough genetically to prevent cross-breeding while maintaining similar appearances. The conversation also touches on the emergence of new virus species, such as HIV, as instances of speciation events. Participants suggest researching the term "new species by separation" for further insights into this phenomenon. Overall, the topic highlights the complexities of speciation and the nuances of defining new species based on genetic divergence rather than physical characteristics.
Alex_Sanders
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Is there any new species defined by taxonomy (unable to cross-breed, therefore a new species) that has very little change in appearances comparing to the "original species" it deviate from?

For instance, a mosquito separated from the original horde long enough, or due to genetic mutation, which made them impossible to breed with the original horde, but still looks quite the same to the original ones? I hope you got the over all idea.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Here's one... its not that new since it was discovered in 1979...

http://ijs.sgmjournals.org/cgi/reprint/29/2/102.pdf

Just google this "new species by separation" and you'll have a fair gamut of research to do.:smile:
 
If you count viruses as showing speciation events, then there are many examples of new virus emergence. For example, HIV is a relatively new species of virus.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top